• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由荷兰心脏基金会(“Nederlandse Hartstichting”)支持的高质量研究

[High quality of research supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation ('Nederlandse Hartstichting')].

作者信息

van der Velde Astrid, van Leeuwen Thed, van Welie Sylvia, Stam Hans, Klaassen André

机构信息

Nederlandse Hartstichting, Den Haag, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A803.

PMID:20170565
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the quality of scientific research funded by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (NHF), using bibliometrical analysis of published research results, in order to determine whether the resources of the NHF for research were being invested wisely.

DESIGN

Retrospective, descriptive.

METHOD

The publication data concerning research projects supported by the NHF are digitally archived in a research information system. These data were used for a bibliometric analysis by the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), using the international publication and citation database 'Web of Science', which contains around 10,000 internationally oriented periodicals. The analysis involved calculating various indicators, such as publication and citation figures, which were used to measure scientific output and impact.

RESULTS

1,353 scientific publications were produced from NHF-supported research that commenced in the period 1999-2007 (reference date 1 Jan 2008). In this period the NHF invested between 10 and 15 million Euros each year in scientific cardiovascular research. The quality of this research is reflected in the citation score of 1.65. This means that these publications were cited 65% more often than the global average. These publications also appeared in renowned periodicals, as is evident from the average journal citation score of 1.50. There were differences in the quality of NHF supported research at the individual universities, but all universities published NHF financed research results with a high impact within the field. The citation score achieved by the Radboud University Nijmegen was outstanding high.

CONCLUSION

The NHF has invested in high quality scientific research.

摘要

目的

通过对已发表研究成果进行文献计量分析,评估荷兰心脏基金会(NHF)资助的科研质量,以确定NHF的研究资源是否得到明智投资。

设计

回顾性、描述性研究。

方法

NHF支持的研究项目的发表数据以数字形式存档于一个研究信息系统。荷兰科学技术研究中心(CWTS)利用国际出版物及引文数据库“科学网”对这些数据进行文献计量分析,该数据库包含约10,000种面向国际的期刊。分析涉及计算各种指标,如发表量和被引次数,用以衡量科研产出和影响力。

结果

1999年至2007年期间(参考日期为2008年1月1日)由NHF资助的研究产生了1353篇科学出版物。在此期间,NHF每年投入1000万至1500万欧元用于心血管科学研究。这项研究的质量体现在被引分数为1.65。这意味着这些出版物的被引次数比全球平均水平高出65%。这些出版物也发表在著名期刊上,平均期刊被引分数为1.50就表明了这一点。各大学在NHF支持的研究质量上存在差异,但所有大学都发表了在该领域具有高影响力的由NHF资助的研究成果。内梅亨拉德堡大学取得的被引分数格外高。

结论

NHF对高质量的科研进行了投资。

相似文献

1
[High quality of research supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation ('Nederlandse Hartstichting')].由荷兰心脏基金会(“Nederlandse Hartstichting”)支持的高质量研究
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A803.
2
[Evaluation of scientific quality using citation analysis and other bibliometric methods].[使用引文分析和其他文献计量方法评估科学质量]
Nord Med. 1989;104(12):331-5, 341.
3
Ophthalmology and vision science research. Part 1: Understanding and using journal impact factors and citation indices.眼科与视觉科学研究。第1部分:理解和使用期刊影响因子及引文索引。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Oct;31(10):1999-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.10.031.
4
[Use of citation analysis and other bibliometric methods in evaluation of the quality of research].[在研究质量评估中使用引文分析及其他文献计量学方法]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Nov 10;109(31):3229-4.
5
[Publication outcome of research funding by the Danish Heart Foundation 1988-1990].[丹麦心脏基金会1988 - 1990年研究资金的出版成果]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Aug 3;160(32):4644-8.
6
[Publication activity at Aalborg Hospital].[奥尔堡医院的出版活动]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Apr 26;172(17):1279-84.
7
The use of citation indicators to identify and support high-quality research in Poland.在波兰使用引文指标来识别和支持高质量研究。
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008 Nov-Dec;56(6):381-4. doi: 10.1007/s00005-008-0042-1. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
8
Measuring the validity of early health technology assessment: bibliometrics as a tool to indicate its scientific basis.衡量早期卫生技术评估的有效性:以文献计量学作为表明其科学依据的工具。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Winter;24(1):70-5. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307080099.
9
The actual citation impact of European oncological research.欧洲肿瘤学研究的实际引文影响力。
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jan;44(2):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.10.020. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
10
Bibliometric analysis of HRC-supported biomedical publications, 1990 to 1994.1990年至1994年由人权委员会资助的生物医学出版物的文献计量分析。
N Z Med J. 1999 Sep 24;112(1096):351-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Looking for the impact of peer review: does count of funding acknowledgements really predict research impact?探寻同行评审的影响:资金致谢的数量真的能预测研究影响力吗?
Scientometrics. 2013 Jan;94(1):57-73. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0779-5. Epub 2012 May 30.