JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb;3(2):230-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.003.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a 15% to 35% incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI). Its spectrum ranges from obvious clinical myocardial infarction to subtle myocardial injury manifested by mild rises in cardiac enzymes. Even in the latter case, the resulting myocardial damage is clinically important, as multiple studies have consistently demonstrated that PMI is associated with increased long-term mortality with a graded risk related to the extent of creatine kinase-MB or cardiac troponin elevation. Despite extensive basic and clinical research and multiple therapeutic approaches, its incidence has not substantially decreased over the last 2 decades. Two patterns of PMI have been recognized by magnetic resonance imaging. Type I is near the intervention site consequent to side branch occlusion, and type II is in the downstream territory of the treated artery where perfusion is compromised mainly due to structural and functional mi-crovascular dysfunction (1). PCI can be considered as an iatrogenic form of plaque rupture. It magnifies underlying or pre-existing microvascular disorders. It is thus not surprising that patients with pre-procedural abnormal coronary flow (2), high cardiovascular risk profiles, or high systemic inflammation markers, such as high sensitivity C-reactive protein, are most likely to have PMI and worse long-term outcomes (3).
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与 15%至 35%的围手术期心肌损伤(PMI)发生率相关。其范围从明显的临床心肌梗死到轻微的心肌损伤,表现为心肌酶轻度升高。即使在后一种情况下,由此产生的心肌损伤在临床上也是重要的,因为多项研究一致表明,PMI 与长期死亡率增加相关,其风险程度与肌酸激酶同工酶-MB 或心脏肌钙蛋白升高的程度有关。尽管进行了广泛的基础和临床研究以及多种治疗方法,但在过去的 20 年中,其发生率并没有显著降低。磁共振成像已经识别出两种 PMI 模式。I 型是由于侧支闭塞而靠近介入部位,II 型是在治疗动脉的下游区域,灌注受损主要是由于结构和功能微血管功能障碍(1)。PCI 可以被认为是一种医源性斑块破裂形式。它放大了潜在的或先前存在的微血管疾病。因此,术前存在异常冠状动脉血流(2)、心血管风险高的患者或高全身炎症标志物(如高敏 C 反应蛋白)的患者最有可能发生 PMI 并出现更差的长期预后(3)。