• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最小变化值设定为一个固定值是否合适?

Is a fixed value for the least significant change appropriate?

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2010 Jan-Mar;13(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.10.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2009.10.001
PMID:20171565
Abstract

The least significant change (LSC) represents the smallest difference between successive measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) that can be considered to be a real change and not attributable to chance. The LSC is derived from same-day in vivo BMD precision measurements. Our first objective was to determine if the LSC differs between technologists. Our second objective was to determine if patient body size influenced the LSC. Each of 8 technologists measured same-day precision in groups of 30 patients for the lumbar spine and the total trochanter and neck regions of the proximal femur. At the spine, precision ranged from 0.008 to 0.011g/cm(2) and did not differ between technologists. Precision for the total region of the left proximal femur ranged from 0.006 to 0.016g/cm(2) and did differ between technologists. For the trochanter and neck regions, precision ranged from 0.008 to 0.013g/cm(2) for the former and from 0.010 to 0.020g/cm(2) for the latter, again, with inter-technologist differences. The LSC for the lumbar spine increased linearly from 0.022 to 0.031g/cm(2) when body mass index (BMI) increased from 19.5 to 31.3kg/m(2). In contrast, there was no discernable impact of BMI on the LSC for any of the proximal femur regions. The LSC at the spine is determined by the patient, whereas the LSC at the femur is determined by the technologist. Use of a single value for the LSC will lead to misinterpretations of the significance of BMD changes at both the spine and the proximal femur.

摘要

最小有意义变化(LSC)代表骨密度(BMD)连续测量值之间的最小差异,可以认为这是真实的变化,而不是偶然的。LSC 是从同日的体内 BMD 精密度测量中得出的。我们的第一个目标是确定技术人员之间的 LSC 是否存在差异。我们的第二个目标是确定患者体型是否会影响 LSC。8 位技术人员中的每位都对 30 位患者的腰椎和股骨近端的总转子和颈部区域进行了同日的精密度测量。在脊柱部位,精密度范围在 0.008 到 0.011g/cm²之间,且技术人员之间没有差异。左侧股骨近端总区域的精密度范围在 0.006 到 0.016g/cm²之间,技术人员之间存在差异。对于转子和颈部区域,前者的精密度范围在 0.008 到 0.013g/cm²之间,后者的精密度范围在 0.010 到 0.020g/cm²之间,技术人员之间也存在差异。当体重指数(BMI)从 19.5 增加到 31.3kg/m²时,腰椎的 LSC 呈线性增加,从 0.022 增加到 0.031g/cm²。相比之下,BMI 对股骨近端任何区域的 LSC 都没有明显的影响。脊柱的 LSC 由患者决定,而股骨的 LSC 由技术人员决定。使用单一的 LSC 值将导致对脊柱和股骨近端 BMD 变化的意义的误解。

相似文献

1
Is a fixed value for the least significant change appropriate?最小变化值设定为一个固定值是否合适?
J Clin Densitom. 2010 Jan-Mar;13(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.10.001.
2
The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.髋部骨密度显著左右差异的患病率。
Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1772-80. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0192-0. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
3
Factors affecting short-term bone density precision assessment and the effect on patient monitoring.影响短期骨密度精确评估的因素及其对患者监测的影响。
J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Feb;23(2):199-204. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.071019.
4
Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice.在日常临床实践中使用双能X线吸收法测量骨密度的可重复性。
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Dec;16(12):1742-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1916-2. Epub 2005 Jun 4.
5
In vivo precision of the GE Lunar iDXA densitometer for the measurement of total-body, lumbar spine, and femoral bone mineral density in adults.GE Lunar iDXA 骨密度仪在成人全身体、腰椎和股骨骨密度测量中的体内精度。
J Clin Densitom. 2010 Oct-Dec;13(4):413-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
6
In vivo precision of the GE lunar iDXA for the assessment of lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and total body bone mineral density in severely obese patients.在严重肥胖患者中,GE 公司 Lunar iDXA 对腰椎、全髋、股骨颈和全身骨密度评估的体内精度。
J Clin Densitom. 2014 Jan-Mar;17(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
7
High bone mineral density in loaded skeletal regions of former professional football (soccer) players: what is the effect of time after active career?前职业足球运动员负荷骨骼区域的高骨矿物质密度:活跃职业生涯结束后的时间有何影响?
Br J Sports Med. 2005 Mar;39(3):154-7; discussion 154-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.011494.
8
Some physical and clinical factors influencing the measurement of precision error, least significant change, and bone mineral density in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.影响双能 X 射线吸收法测量精度误差、最小显著变化和骨密度的一些物理和临床因素。
J Clin Densitom. 2010 Jan-Mar;13(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
9
Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring.骨密度精度评估的最小样本量要求在临床监测中产生了不一致性。
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(11):1673-80. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0170-6. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
10
The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice.光谱偏差在临床实践中对骨密度监测的重要性。
Bone. 2006 Aug;39(2):361-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vivo Bone Mineral Density Assessment With Spectral Localizer Radiographs From Photon-Counting Detector CT: Prospective Comparison With DXA.使用光子计数探测器CT的光谱定位X光片进行体内骨密度评估:与双能X线吸收法的前瞻性比较
Invest Radiol. 2025 Aug 1;60(8):535-542. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001159. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
2
CYP2C19 genotypes and osteoporotic fractures in long-term users of proton pump inhibitors: A hospital-based study.质子泵抑制剂长期使用者的 CYP2C19 基因型与骨质疏松性骨折:一项基于医院的研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov;16(11):2198-2208. doi: 10.1111/cts.13620. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
3
The Significance of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Examination in Cushing's Syndrome-A Systematic Review.
双能X线吸收法(DXA)检查在库欣综合征中的意义——一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;13(9):1576. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091576.
4
The impact of obesity on the accuracy of DXA BMD for DXA-equivalent BMD estimation.肥胖对 DXA 骨密度与 DXA 等效骨密度估计准确性的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 26;23(1):1130. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06076-0.
5
Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity Associations between Fat Mass and Lean Mass with Bone Mineral Density: NHANES Data.年龄、性别和种族/民族与骨密度的脂肪量和瘦体量的关系:NHANES 数据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;18(23):12606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312606.
6
Multi-energy computed tomography and material quantification: Current barriers and opportunities for advancement.多能量计算机断层扫描与物质定量分析:当前的障碍与发展机遇
Med Phys. 2020 Aug;47(8):3752-3771. doi: 10.1002/mp.14241. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
Lipid is heterogeneously distributed in muscle and associates with low radiodensity in cancer patients.脂质在肌肉中呈不均匀分布,并与癌症患者的低放射密度相关。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Jun;11(3):735-747. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12533. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
8
Upright activity and higher motor function may preserve bone mineral density within 6 months of stroke: a longitudinal study.直立活动和更高的运动功能可能在中风后 6 个月内保持骨密度:一项纵向研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Jan 8;13(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0414-4.
9
Bone loss after bariatric surgery: discordant results between DXA and QCT bone density.减肥手术后的骨质流失:双能X线吸收法(DXA)与定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)骨密度检测结果不一致
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Mar;29(3):542-50. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2063.
10
Changes in bone mineral density in women following 1-year gastric bypass surgery, published by Casagrande DS et al.--reply.卡萨格兰德DS等人发表的关于女性在接受1年后胃旁路手术后骨矿物质密度的变化——回复
Obes Surg. 2013 Nov;23(11):1886. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1019-7.