Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Theriogenology. 2010 Jun;73(9):1284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
The objectives were to determine the: 1) extent of epithelial and red blood cell contamination in epididymal cat sperm samples recovered by the cutting method; 2) efficacy of simple washing, single-layer centrifugation (SLC), and swim-up for selecting epididymal cat sperm; and 3) effects of freezing and thawing on cat sperm selected by various techniques. Ten unit samples were studied; each contained sperm from the cauda epididymides of four cats (total, approximately 200 x 10(6) sperm) and was equally allocated into four treatments: 1) simple washing, 2) single-layer centrifugation through colloid prior to cryopreservation (SLC-PC), 3) single-layer centrifugation through colloid after cryopreservation (SLC-AC), and 4) swim-up. Centrifugation (300 x g for 20 min) was done for all methods. The SLC-PC had a better recovery rate than the SLC-AC and swim-up methods (mean+/-SD of 16.4+/-8.7, 10.7+/-8.9, and 2.3+/-1.7%, respectively; P<0.05). The SLC-PC, SLC-AC and swim-up samples contained less red blood cell contamination than simple washed samples (0.02+/-0.01, 0.02+/-0.04, 0.03+/-0.04, and 0.44+/-0.22 x 10(6) cells/mL, respectively; P<0.05). Although the proportion of sperm with head abnormalities did not differ among selection methods (P>0.05), SLC-PC yielded the highest percentage of sperm with normal midpieces and tails (P<0.05), due to the lowest proportion of coiled tails (P<0.05). Furthermore, the SLC-PC was as effective as swim-up in removing sperm with proximal droplets, and selecting motile sperm, as well as those with intact membranes and DNA (P>0.05). In conclusion, both SLC-PC and swim-up improved the quality of epididymal cat sperm, including better morphology, membrane and DNA integrity, and removal of cellular contamination. However, SLC had a better sperm recovery rate than swim-up.
1)通过切割法回收的附睾猫精子样本中上皮细胞和红细胞污染的程度;2)简单洗涤、单层离心(SLC)和游泳选择附睾猫精子的效果;3)冷冻和解冻对各种技术选择的猫精子的影响。研究了 10 个单位样本;每个样本包含来自 4 只猫的尾部附睾的精子(总计约 200 x 10(6)精子),并平均分配到以下四个处理组:1)简单洗涤,2)冷冻前通过胶体单层离心(SLC-PC),3)冷冻后通过胶体单层离心(SLC-AC),4)游泳。所有方法都进行了离心(300 x g 20 分钟)。SLC-PC 的回收率优于 SLC-AC 和游泳方法(分别为 16.4+/-8.7%、10.7+/-8.9%和 2.3+/-1.7%;P<0.05)。SLC-PC、SLC-AC 和游泳样本的红细胞污染程度低于简单洗涤样本(分别为 0.02+/-0.01、0.02+/-0.04、0.03+/-0.04 和 0.44+/-0.22 x 10(6)细胞/mL;P<0.05)。尽管精子头部异常的比例在选择方法之间没有差异(P>0.05),但 SLC-PC 产生了最高比例的正常中段和尾部精子(P<0.05),因为卷曲尾巴的比例最低(P<0.05)。此外,SLC-PC 在去除近端液滴、选择运动精子以及具有完整膜和 DNA 的精子方面与游泳一样有效(P>0.05)。总之,SLC-PC 和游泳都改善了附睾猫精子的质量,包括更好的形态、膜和 DNA 完整性,以及去除细胞污染。然而,SLC 的精子回收率优于游泳。