Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Apr;21(4):470-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.12.392. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
To retrospectively review a 9-year experience with endovascular management of inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization during subclavian vein cannulation.
From June 2000 through July 2009 (109 months), 13 patients underwent endovascular management of inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization. All catheters were still in situ, including one 7-F catheter, six 8-F catheters, and six large-bore 10-11-F catheters. Treatment was performed with an Angio-Seal device (n = 6) or balloon catheters (n = 7) and by additional stent-graft placement (n = 4).
Mean follow-up was 27.3 months (range, 0.4-78 months). The 30-day mortality rate was 7.7% and the late mortality rate was 46.1%. Primary technical success was achieved in nine patients (69.2%), in four with the use of a compliant balloon catheter and in the other five with an Angio-Seal device. Complications required additional stent-graft placement in four patients (30.8%), one because of stenosis after Angio-Seal device deployment and three as a result of insufficient closure of the puncture site by balloon tamponade. Stent-graft repair was successful in all four patients, for a primary assisted technical success rate of 100%.
Endovascular techniques offer a less invasive alternative to surgery. The present limited experience shows that the use of the Angio-Seal device is not without risks, whereas balloon tamponade is not always reliable in closing the puncture site. Stent-graft placement may be required in patients in whom balloon tamponade fails or in whom the use of the Angio-Seal device is contraindicated.
回顾性分析 9 年来锁骨下静脉穿刺时意外误穿锁骨下动脉的血管内治疗经验。
2000 年 6 月至 2009 年 7 月(109 个月)期间,13 例患者接受了血管内治疗,以处理锁骨下静脉穿刺时意外误穿锁骨下动脉。所有导管均仍在原位,包括 1 根 7-F 导管、6 根 8-F 导管和 6 根大口径 10-11-F 导管。采用 Angio-Seal 装置(n=6)或球囊导管(n=7)进行治疗,并额外放置支架移植物(n=4)。
平均随访时间为 27.3 个月(0.4-78 个月)。30 天死亡率为 7.7%,晚期死亡率为 46.1%。9 例患者(69.2%)实现了主要技术成功,其中 4 例采用顺应性球囊导管,5 例采用 Angio-Seal 装置。另外 4 例患者(30.8%)因并发症需要额外放置支架移植物,其中 1 例因 Angio-Seal 装置放置后出现狭窄,3 例因球囊压迫不能充分封闭穿刺部位。4 例患者的支架移植物修复均成功,总辅助技术成功率为 100%。
血管内技术为手术提供了一种微创替代方法。目前有限的经验表明,Angio-Seal 装置的使用并非没有风险,而球囊压迫在封闭穿刺部位时并不总是可靠的。如果球囊压迫失败或使用 Angio-Seal 装置有禁忌证,可能需要放置支架移植物。