Suppr超能文献

技术说明:在分析饲料和消化物样品中的脂肪酸时,常见的分析错误会导致结果不准确。

Technical note: common analytical errors yielding inaccurate results during analysis of fatty acids in feed and digesta samples.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1170-4. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2509.

Abstract

The basic rules governing the proper fatty acid analysis of feed and digesta samples are sometimes overlooked, leading to potential errors in reporting the fatty acid content or composition of feed and digesta samples. The direct transesterification procedure of Sukhija and Palmquist (1988, J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:1202-1206) has become popular in analyzing fatty acids in feed and digesta samples obtained from animal feeding trials. One shortcoming of the Sukhija and Palmquist transesterification procedure is inaccurate analysis of fatty acids with conjugated double bonds. Digesta and milk samples from ruminant species typically contain a multitude of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers that easily undergo isomerization and epimerization following prolonged exposure to methanolic HCl. Modifications to the Sukhija and Palmquist procedure are given in this paper that allow successful determination of CLA isomers. Errors in fatty acid analysis also occur from misuse of internal standards; use of an internal standard is recommended in the Sukhija and Palmquist procedure as the preferred method to quantify total fatty acid content. The choice of internal standard may sometimes be important for obtaining accurate results. As an example, applying the direct transesterification procedure to a fat supplement high in saturated fatty acids yielded 613 mg/g of total fatty acids when C17 was used as the internal standard compared with 930 mg/g total fatty acids when C19 was used as the internal standard. Fatty acid content further increased to 952 mg/g when a unique unsaturated fatty acid (C13:1) was used as the internal standard.

摘要

在对饲料和消化产物样品进行适当的脂肪酸分析时,有些基本规则经常被忽视,这可能导致报告饲料和消化产物样品的脂肪酸含量或组成时出现潜在错误。Sukhija 和 Palmquist(1988,J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:1202-1206)提出的直接酯交换法在分析动物饲养试验中获得的饲料和消化产物样品中的脂肪酸时已经变得非常流行。Sukhija 和 Palmquist 酯交换法的一个缺点是不能准确分析具有共轭双键的脂肪酸。反刍动物的消化产物和奶样通常含有大量的共轭亚油酸(CLA)异构体,这些异构体在长时间暴露于甲醇盐酸中后很容易发生异构化和差向异构化。本文给出了对 Sukhija 和 Palmquist 方法的改进,使 CLA 异构体的测定成为可能。脂肪酸分析中的错误也可能是由于对内标物的不当使用造成的;建议在 Sukhija 和 Palmquist 方法中使用内标物,这是定量总脂肪酸含量的首选方法。内标物的选择有时对于获得准确的结果可能很重要。例如,将直接酯交换法应用于一种富含饱和脂肪酸的脂肪补充剂时,当使用 C17 作为内标时,总脂肪酸含量为 613mg/g,而当使用 C19 作为内标时,总脂肪酸含量为 930mg/g。当使用独特的不饱和脂肪酸(C13:1)作为内标时,脂肪酸含量进一步增加到 952mg/g。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验