Suppr超能文献

心脏死亡后器官捐献来源的高肌酐肾移植的机器灌注保存

Machine perfusion preservation for kidney grafts with a high creatinine from uncontrolled donation after cardiac death.

作者信息

Matsuno N, Konno Y N O, Jyojima Y, Akashi I, Iwamoto H, Hama K, Hiirano T, Nagao T

机构信息

The 5th Department of Surgery, Hachioji Medical Center of Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2010 Jan-Feb;42(1):155-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.11.024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the usefulness of machine perfusion preservation parameters as selection criteria for donation after cardiac arrest (DCD) with high creatinine level. The aim of this study is to evaluate to whether DCD donor >50 years old and with high creatinine are acceptable.

METHODS

We examined 17 kidneys from uncontrolled DCD who showed creatinine levels >3.0 mg/dL before procurement. The study included the following two groups: group 1 (n = 9), donor age <50 years old versus group 2 (n = 8), donor age >50 years old.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in donors or preservation conditions among the 2 groups, including age, terminal creatinine, warm ischemic time, cold perfusion time, and total ischemic time. A greater resistance of 47.9 mmHg/mL per min/g was observed among group 2, compared with 42.5 mmHg/mL per min/g in group 1. A shorter ATN period (8.2 days) was noted in group 1, compared with 21.2 days for group 2. The flow rate (mL/g/min) was not significantly different between the two groups. The best-Cr level was 1.22 mg/dL in group 1 and 1.94 mg/dL in group 2.

CONCLUSION

Machine perfusion flow was a reliable indicator of graft viability in uncontrolled DCD, particularly kidneys with high creatinine level. Even older donors were acceptable if the machine perfusion preservation parameters such as flow rate and pressure were acceptable; however, they may show severe delayed graft function.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了机器灌注保存参数作为心脏骤停后捐赠(DCD)且肌酐水平高的选择标准的有用性。本研究的目的是评估50岁以上且肌酐水平高的DCD供体是否可接受。

方法

我们检查了17个来自非控制性DCD的肾脏,这些肾脏在获取前肌酐水平>3.0mg/dL。该研究包括以下两组:第1组(n = 9),供体年龄<50岁,与第2组(n = 8),供体年龄>50岁。

结果

两组之间在供体或保存条件方面没有显著差异,包括年龄、终末肌酐、热缺血时间、冷灌注时间和总缺血时间。第2组观察到的阻力更大,为47.9mmHg/mL每分钟/g,而第1组为42.5mmHg/mL每分钟/g。第1组的急性肾小管坏死期较短(8.2天),而第2组为21.2天。两组之间的流速(mL/g/分钟)没有显著差异。第1组的最佳肌酐水平为1.22mg/dL,第2组为1.94mg/dL。

结论

在非控制性DCD中,尤其是肌酐水平高的肾脏,机器灌注流量是移植物存活的可靠指标。如果机器灌注保存参数如流速和压力可接受,即使是年龄较大的供体也是可接受的;然而,它们可能会出现严重的移植肾功能延迟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验