Chiurchiu C, Carreño C A, Schiavelli R, Petrone H, Balaguer C, Trimarchi H, Pujol G S, Novoa P, Acosta F, González C, Arriola M, Massari P U
Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hospital Privado, Cordoba, Argentina.
Transplant Proc. 2010 Jan-Feb;42(1):277-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.11.017.
Management of posttransplantation malignancies should include control of the neoplasia and preservation of renal function. Conversion to everolimus (EVL) would potentially have both effects. Twenty-one patients were converted to EVL due to posttransplantation neoplasms. We have presented herein descriptive data and postconversion (PC) outcomes among subjects of mean age 53.6 +/- 10.1 years (range, 36-69), 57.1% were males, undergoing conversion at 108.2 +/- 74.7 (range, 5-316) months after transplantation. All patients received standard immunosuppressive therapy and 9.5% had been induced with thymoglobulin. Malignant neoplasms were as follows: skin (n = 7), gynecological (n = 3), gastrointestinal (n = 3), PTLD (n = 2), renal (n = 2), CNS (n = 1), seminoma (n = 1), Kaposi's sarcoma (n = 1), and prostate cancer (n = 1). PC to EVL, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) were discontinued in 18 of 19 patients, mycophenolate in 9/12, and azathioprine in 5/7; all patients continued to receive steroids. In 16 patients (79%) tumors were removed. Chemotherapy was performed in 2 patients with PTLD and radiotherapy was performed in 1 patient with prostate cancer. Mean follow-up was 505 days (range, 59-1151); baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 53.5 +/- 21.6 mL/min versus 48.5 +/- 25.7 mL/min (P = not significant [NS]) at the last control. One patient experienced graft loss at day 744 after conversion due to chronic rejection. Adverse events were observed in 57% of patients and 28% displayed infections; no patient discontinued EVL. There were 2 deaths: 1 due to an infection and the other due to postsurgical complication. No deaths due to cancer progression were observed. The results observed in this series suggested that conversion to EVL for a posttransplantation neoplasm is a valid therapeutic alternative to preserve graft function and control disease progression.
移植后恶性肿瘤的管理应包括控制肿瘤形成和保留肾功能。转换为依维莫司(EVL)可能会产生这两种效果。21例患者因移植后肿瘤而转换为EVL。我们在此展示了平均年龄为53.6±10.1岁(范围36 - 69岁)、57.1%为男性、在移植后108.2±74.7(范围5 - 316)个月进行转换的受试者的描述性数据和转换后(PC)结果。所有患者均接受标准免疫抑制治疗,9.5%患者使用了抗胸腺细胞球蛋白诱导治疗。恶性肿瘤如下:皮肤(n = 7)、妇科(n = 3)、胃肠道(n = 3)、移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病(PTLD,n = 2)、肾脏(n = 2)、中枢神经系统(n = 1)、精原细胞瘤(n = 1)、卡波西肉瘤(n = 1)和前列腺癌(n = 1)。转换为EVL后,19例患者中有18例停用钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNIs),12例中有9例停用霉酚酸酯,7例中有5例停用硫唑嘌呤;所有患者继续接受类固醇治疗。16例患者(79%)的肿瘤被切除。2例PTLD患者接受了化疗,1例前列腺癌患者接受了放疗。平均随访时间为505天(范围59 - 1151天);末次检查时基线肾小球滤过率(GFR)为53.5±21.6 mL/分钟,而此前为48.5±25.7 mL/分钟(P = 无显著差异[NS])。1例患者在转换后第744天因慢性排斥反应导致移植肾失功。57%的患者观察到不良事件,28%的患者出现感染;无患者停用EVL。有2例死亡:1例死于感染,另1例死于术后并发症。未观察到因癌症进展导致的死亡。本系列观察结果表明,对于移植后肿瘤转换为EVL是一种有效的治疗选择,可保留移植肾功能并控制疾病进展。