Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Semin Oncol. 2010 Feb;37(1):27-30. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.12.009.
Cancer staging has been the lynchpin of diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis for several years. However, new advances in molecular genetics, statistics, and computer science have been mounting a challenge to cancer staging in accurate prognostication. Staging systems, such as tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, have been reacting to these challenges by increasing the number of stage groupings. In this article we examine the history of the number of increases in stage groups and argue that recent increases have not been accompanied by increased ease of use or better prognostic ability. We recommend that parsimony should be considered to counterbalance the instinct to increase the number of categories in future revisions of staging systems such as TNM.
癌症分期一直是多年来诊断、治疗和预后的关键。然而,分子遗传学、统计学和计算机科学的新进展一直在对癌症分期的准确预后提出挑战。分期系统,如肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分类,一直在通过增加分期组来应对这些挑战。在本文中,我们考察了分期组数量增加的历史,并认为最近的增加并没有带来使用便利性的提高或更好的预后能力。我们建议在未来修订 TNM 等分期系统时,应该考虑简约性,以平衡增加分类数量的本能。