Cambridge Health Alliance, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA University of Michigan School of Public Health, 109 S. Observatory Street, Building 1-6667, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Hermann-Ehlers-Str.1053113 Bonn, Germany Osher Research Center of Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215, USA Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Pain. 2010 Apr;149(1):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.016. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Amitriptyline is sometimes used to treat arm pain related to repetitive use, but rigorous evidence of its benefit is lacking. This randomized controlled trial investigated whether amitriptyline provided greater pain relief or improved arm function than a placebo pill in adults with arm pain associated with repetitive use that had persisted for at least 3 months. Participants (N=118) were randomly assigned to receive 25mg of amitriptyline or a placebo pill for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was intensity of pain (10-point numerical rating scale) and secondary outcomes were arm symptoms, arm function, grip strength, mood, and sleep. Assessments were done at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks of treatment, and 1 month after the treatment ended. Changes in arm pain were not statistically significant. However, the amitriptyline group improved more than the placebo group in arm function (p=0.023) and sense of well being (p=0.034). In a longitudinal analysis, the amitriptyline group's arm function score improved 0.45 points per week faster than placebo after adjusting for subject characteristics (p=0.015). At the treatment's midpoint, the amitriptyline group reported more "troublesome side-effects" than the placebo group (52.5% vs. 27.1%, p=0.005), but this difference decreased by the end of the treatment (30.5% vs. 22.0%, p=0.30). The most frequent side effect was drowsiness. In conclusion, this study found that low-dose amitriptyline did not significantly decrease arm pain among these participants but did significantly improve arm function and well being. Future research is needed to explore the effects of higher doses and longer duration of treatment.
阿米替林有时用于治疗与重复使用相关的手臂疼痛,但缺乏其疗效的严格证据。这项随机对照试验调查了在手臂疼痛与重复使用相关且持续至少 3 个月的成年人中,与安慰剂相比,阿米替林是否能提供更大的疼痛缓解或改善手臂功能。参与者(N=118)被随机分配接受 25mg 阿米替林或安慰剂治疗 6 周。主要结局是疼痛强度(10 分数字评定量表),次要结局是手臂症状、手臂功能、握力、情绪和睡眠。在基线、治疗 3 周和 6 周以及治疗结束后 1 个月进行评估。手臂疼痛的变化没有统计学意义。然而,与安慰剂组相比,阿米替林组在手臂功能(p=0.023)和幸福感(p=0.034)方面的改善更为显著。在纵向分析中,在调整了受试者特征后,阿米替林组手臂功能评分每周改善 0.45 分,比安慰剂组快(p=0.015)。在治疗的中点,阿米替林组报告的“麻烦的副作用”比安慰剂组多(52.5%比 27.1%,p=0.005),但在治疗结束时,这种差异减小(30.5%比 22.0%,p=0.30)。最常见的副作用是嗜睡。总之,本研究发现低剂量阿米替林并没有显著减轻这些参与者的手臂疼痛,但显著改善了手臂功能和幸福感。需要进一步研究来探讨更高剂量和更长治疗时间的效果。