Suppr超能文献

量化与临床前列腺检查表现相关的触诊技术。

Quantifying palpation techniques in relation to performance in a clinical prostate exam.

作者信息

Wang Ninghuan, Gerling Gregory J, Childress Reba Moyer, Martin Marcus L

机构信息

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010 Jul;14(4):1088-97. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2010.2041064. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

Abstract

This paper seeks to quantify finger palpation techniques in the prostate clinical exam, determine their relationship with performance in detecting abnormalities, and differentiate the tendencies of nurse practitioner students and resident physicians. One issue with the digital rectal examination (DRE) is that performance in detecting abnormalities varies greatly and agreement between examiners is low. The utilization of particular palpation techniques may be one way to improve clinician ability. Based on past qualitative instruction, this paper algorithmically defines a set of palpation techniques for the DRE, i.e., global finger movement (GFM), local finger movement (LFM), and average intentional finger pressure, and utilizes a custom-built simulator to analyze finger movements in an experiment with two groups: 18 nurse practitioner students and 16 resident physicians. Although technique utilization varied, some elements clearly impacted performance. For example, those utilizing the LFM of vibration were significantly better at detecting abnormalities. Also, the V GFM led to greater success, but finger pressure played a lesser role. Interestingly, while the residents were clearly the superior performers, their techniques differed only subtly from the students. In summary, the quantified palpation techniques appear to account for examination ability at some level, but not entirely for differences between groups.

摘要

本文旨在量化前列腺临床检查中的手指触诊技术,确定其与检测异常表现之间的关系,并区分执业护士学生和住院医师的倾向。直肠指检(DRE)的一个问题是,检测异常的表现差异很大,检查者之间的一致性很低。使用特定的触诊技术可能是提高临床医生能力的一种方法。基于过去的定性指导,本文通过算法定义了一组用于DRE的触诊技术,即全局手指移动(GFM)、局部手指移动(LFM)和平均有意手指压力,并利用一个定制的模拟器在两组实验中分析手指运动:18名执业护士学生和16名住院医师。虽然技术使用情况各不相同,但一些因素显然会影响表现。例如,那些使用振动LFM的人在检测异常方面明显更好。此外,V GFM带来了更大的成功,但手指压力的作用较小。有趣的是,虽然住院医师显然是表现更优者,但他们的技术与学生的技术仅略有不同。总之,量化的触诊技术似乎在一定程度上解释了检查能力,但不能完全解释组间差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验