Pyykkönen Pirita, Järvikivi Juhani
Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Finland.
Exp Psychol. 2010;57(1):5-16. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000002.
A visual world eye-tracking study investigated the activation and persistence of implicit causality information in spoken language comprehension. We showed that people infer the implicit causality of verbs as soon as they encounter such verbs in discourse, as is predicted by proponents of the immediate focusing account (Greene & McKoon, 1995; Koornneef & Van Berkum, 2006; Van Berkum, Koornneef, Otten, & Nieuwland, 2007). Interestingly, we observed activation of implicit causality information even before people encountered the causal conjunction. However, while implicit causality information was persistent as the discourse unfolded, it did not have a privileged role as a focusing cue immediately at the ambiguous pronoun when people were resolving its antecedent. Instead, our study indicated that implicit causality does not affect all referents to the same extent, rather it interacts with other cues in the discourse, especially when one of the referents is already prominently in focus.
一项视觉世界眼动追踪研究调查了口语理解中隐含因果关系信息的激活与持续性。我们发现,正如即时聚焦理论的支持者所预测的那样(格林和麦库恩,1995年;科恩内夫和范·贝库姆,2006年;范·贝库姆、科恩内夫、奥滕和纽兰德,2007年),人们在话语中一遇到此类动词就会推断其隐含因果关系。有趣的是,我们观察到,甚至在人们遇到因果连词之前,隐含因果关系信息就已被激活。然而,虽然随着话语展开,隐含因果关系信息持续存在,但在人们解析歧义代词的先行词时,它并没有作为聚焦线索立即发挥特权作用。相反,我们的研究表明,隐含因果关系对所有所指对象的影响程度并不相同,相反,它与话语中的其他线索相互作用,尤其是当其中一个所指对象已经显著聚焦时。