Rethinking peer review.
作者信息
Young Kue
出版信息
CMAJ. 2010 Feb 23;182(3):281. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110-2025.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rethinking peer review.
CMAJ. 2010 Feb 23;182(3):281. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110-2025.
2
What we owe the author: rethinking editorial peer review.
Nurs Ethics. 1998 Sep;5(5):451-8. doi: 10.1177/096973309800500508.
3
Social epistemology and the ethics of research.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 1996 Dec;27(4):565-86. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(96)00043-x.
4
Why be my colleague's keeper? Moral justifications for peer review.
Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Oct;5(4):531-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0053-2.
5
Believing what you read. Responsibilities of medical authors and editors.
Arch Intern Med. 1986 Oct;146(10):2043-4.
6
Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;98(6):1143-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01685-4.
7
Ethics of guidelines for reviewers of medical manuscripts.
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):391-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.05.024.
8
[Authorship and co-authorship].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Feb 9;126(4):429.
9
Editorial: CORR Will Change to Double-blind Peer Review-What Took Us So Long to Get There?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):297-299. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5198-0. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
10
Provision of and response to manuscript reviews.
Adv Neonatal Care. 2014 Jun;14(3):137-8. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000097.
本文引用的文献
1
Disseminate time-sensitive research faster.
CMAJ. 2010 Jan 12;182(1):9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092077. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
Zotero 插件