Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂:16 年单中心研究。

Laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center study during 16 years.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2401-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0962-9. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many different techniques to treat rectal prolapse have been introduced. Laparoscopic resection rectopexy has been shown to entail benefits regarding both perioperative results and short-term outcome, whereas data for long-term outcome are scarce.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2008, all laparoscopic resection rectopexies for rectal prolapse II° or III° were selected from a prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. We analyzed demographic, perioperative, and follow-up results. We defined two periods (1993-2000 and 2001-2008) for comparison of data. Long-term follow-up was obtained by sending questionnaires to all patients. Evaluation included constipation, incontinence, and recurrence of prolapse.

RESULTS

Between January 1993 and November 2008, we performed 152 laparoscopic resection rectopexies for rectal prolapse. Median age was 64.1 years (± 14.6). Conversion rate was 0.7% (1), mean operation time was 204 (± 65.3) min, and was significantly shorter in the second period compared with the first (P < 0.0001). Mortality was 0.7% (n = 1). Complication rates were 4% (n = 6; major) and 19.2% (n = 29; minor), respectively. Mean length of hospital stay was 11.3 (± 6.4) days and was significantly shorter in the second period compared with the first period (P < 0.0001). Mean time of follow-up was 47.7 (± 41.6) months. Improvement or complete elimination of constipation was stated by 81.3% (65), and improvement or elimination of incontinence was stated by 67.3% (72). Overall recurrence rate was 11.1% (n = 10) with a rate of 5.6% (n = 5) for a 5-year period. Of those patients with previous perineal surgery for rectal prolapse, 53.8% (7/13) experienced recurrent prolapse after laparoscopic resection rectopexy in contrast to 3.9% (3/77) of patients without previous perineal prolapse surgery (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the benefits of laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse regarding both perioperative results and long-term functional outcome. Preceding perineal or open abdominal operations have an impact on recurrence after laparoscopic resection rectopexy.

摘要

背景

已经引入了许多不同的技术来治疗直肠前突。腹腔镜直肠固定术在围手术期结果和短期结果方面都显示出了益处,而长期结果的数据则很少。

方法

1993 年至 2008 年间,我们从前瞻性腹腔镜结直肠手术数据库中选择了所有用于治疗 II°或 III°直肠前突的腹腔镜直肠切除术。我们分析了人口统计学、围手术期和随访结果。我们定义了两个时期(1993-2000 年和 2001-2008 年)来比较数据。通过向所有患者发送问卷获得长期随访。评估包括便秘、失禁和脱垂复发。

结果

1993 年 1 月至 2008 年 11 月,我们共进行了 152 例腹腔镜直肠切除术治疗直肠前突。中位年龄为 64.1 岁(± 14.6)。转化率为 0.7%(1),平均手术时间为 204(± 65.3)分钟,第二阶段明显短于第一阶段(P < 0.0001)。死亡率为 0.7%(n = 1)。并发症发生率分别为 4%(n = 6;主要)和 19.2%(n = 29;次要)。平均住院时间为 11.3(± 6.4)天,第二阶段明显短于第一阶段(P < 0.0001)。平均随访时间为 47.7(± 41.6)个月。81.3%(65 人)表示便秘得到改善或完全消除,67.3%(72 人)表示失禁得到改善或消除。总复发率为 11.1%(n = 10),5 年时的复发率为 5.6%(n = 5)。在先前因直肠前突而行会阴手术的患者中,53.8%(7/13)在接受腹腔镜直肠固定术后出现复发,而在没有先前会阴前突手术的患者中,这一比例为 3.9%(3/77)(P < 0.0001)。

结论

我们的数据支持腹腔镜直肠固定术治疗直肠前突的益处,无论是在围手术期结果还是长期功能结果方面。先前的会阴或开放腹部手术会影响腹腔镜直肠固定术后的复发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验