• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胃束带术后带袢撕裂:5 年 865 例患者的回顾性分析。

Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective analysis of 865 patients over 5 years.

机构信息

Shropshire Upper GI and Laparoscopic Surgery Unit, Princess Royal Hospital, Telford TF6 1TF, England.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):2031-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0899-z. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-0899-z
PMID:20177941
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric band erosion is a well-reported complication after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The published literature is limited and inconclusive with regard to its management. The authors therefore reviewed all band erosions detected during a 5-year period in a high-volume bariatric practice. Because a significant proportion of the band insertions (65%) were undertaken by an operator beyond his learning curve, the authors hoped to gain a mature, comprehensive understanding of this significant complication.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the operative log of the operating theaters in their obesity surgery unit to find all the operations performed on LAGB patients for erosion from January 2003 to December 2007. The clinical notes and electronic records for each patient were reviewed. These data were cross-referenced against the authors' obesity surgery database, and denominator data such as the total number operations performed and demographics were found. Finally, postoperative outcomes were collated from the outpatient follow-up data and telephonic interviews, and the results were analyzed.

RESULTS

From January 2003 to December 2007, a single surgeon performed 865 LAGBs in the authors' unit. The authors identified 18 operations performed for LAGB erosions. The 18 patients (one referred from elsewhere, 14 women) formed the final study cohort (median preoperative body mass index [BMI], 46 kg/m(2)). Of the 17 erosions, 15 occurred relatively early in the series. The patients with the 213 Swedish adjustable gastric bands experienced 12 erosions (incidence, 5.6%) compared with 6 erosions with the 652 LAP-BANDs (incidence, 0.9%). The median time to presentation was 7 months (range, 1-60 months). However, 55% of the erosions (n = 10) occurred within the first year, and only 10% occurred after the second year. The most common presenting symptom was pain followed by weight regain. None of the patients experienced peritonitis. After surgical management of the erosion, three patients had a second LAGB and at this writing are well. Of the remaining patients, 11 are well, but 6 of these patients have returned to their previous weight (4 patients were lost to follow-up evaluation).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of LAGB erosions in our series was 1.96%. This incidence fell with increasing experience to 0.5% after the initial 300 bands were excluded from the analysis (3 band erosions in the last 565 band insertions). However, further increases in incidence are likely with a longer follow-up period. The most common presentation was abdominal pain followed by weight regain and port-site sepsis. In the authors' hands, laparoscopic omental plugging and band removal through a separate anterior gastrotomy appear to be effective methods for dealing with band erosions. Band erosion is a significant source of morbidity, with at least one-third of the erosion patients in our series not achieving their final goal of weight loss despite appropriate treatment. This study highlights the need for a future prospective randomized study to clarify the apparent strong influence of band design and construction on the etiopathogenesis of band erosion.

摘要

背景

胃带侵蚀是腹腔镜可调胃带(LAGB)后报道的一种并发症。发表的文献对其管理的结论并不明确。因此,作者回顾了高容量减肥实践中在 5 年内发现的所有带侵蚀。由于 65%的带插入(超过)是由操作人员在学习曲线之外进行的,因此作者希望对这种严重并发症有一个成熟、全面的了解。

方法

作者回顾性地查阅了肥胖手术单位手术室的手术记录,以查找 2003 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月期间所有因侵蚀而进行 LAGB 手术的患者的手术。回顾了每位患者的临床记录和电子记录。这些数据与作者的肥胖手术数据库交叉引用,并找到了操作总数和人口统计学等分母数据。最后,从门诊随访数据和电话访谈中收集术后结果,并进行分析。

结果

从 2003 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月,一位外科医生在作者的单位进行了 865 次 LAGB。作者发现了 18 次因 LAGB 侵蚀而进行的手术。这 18 名患者(一名从其他地方转来,14 名女性)组成了最终的研究队列(术前平均体重指数 [BMI],46kg/m2)。在 17 个侵蚀中,有 15 个发生在系列早期。在 213 个瑞典可调胃带中,有 12 个发生侵蚀(发生率为 5.6%),而在 652 个 LAP-BAND 中,有 6 个发生侵蚀(发生率为 0.9%)。出现症状的中位时间为 7 个月(范围,1-60 个月)。然而,55%(n=10)的侵蚀发生在第一年,只有 10%发生在第二年以后。最常见的症状是疼痛,其次是体重减轻。没有患者发生腹膜炎。在对侵蚀进行手术治疗后,有 3 名患者再次接受 LAGB 治疗,目前情况良好。在其余患者中,11 人情况良好,但其中 6 人恢复到了以前的体重(4 人失去了随访评估)。

结论

在我们的研究中,LAGB 侵蚀的总发生率为 1.96%。随着经验的增加,这个发生率下降到 300 个带被排除在分析之外后为 0.5%(在最后 565 个带插入中发生了 3 个带侵蚀)。然而,随着随访时间的延长,发病率可能会进一步增加。最常见的表现是腹痛,其次是体重减轻和端口部位感染。在作者的手中,腹腔镜网膜填塞和通过单独的前胃切开术去除带似乎是处理带侵蚀的有效方法。带侵蚀是一种严重的发病率源,在我们的研究中,至少有三分之一的侵蚀患者尽管经过适当治疗,但仍未达到减肥的最终目标。这项研究强调需要进行未来的前瞻性随机研究,以明确带设计和结构对带侵蚀病因学的明显强烈影响。

相似文献

1
Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective analysis of 865 patients over 5 years.腹腔镜胃束带术后带袢撕裂:5 年 865 例患者的回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):2031-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0899-z. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
2
Management of band erosion with omental plugging: case series from a 5-year laparoscopic gastric banding experience.带袢式胃内水球治疗胃轻瘫的初步临床观察 带袢式胃内水球治疗胃轻瘫的初步临床观察 带袢式胃内水球治疗胃轻瘫的初步临床观察 带袢式胃内水球治疗胃轻瘫的初步临床观察
Obes Surg. 2009 Oct;19(10):1409-13. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9925-4. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
3
Laparoscopic management of gastric band erosions: a 10-year series of 49 cases.腹腔镜治疗胃束带侵蚀:49 例 10 年系列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):541-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1916-6. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
4
Intragastric gastric band migration: erosion: an analysis of multicenter experience on 177 patients.胃内胃束带迁移:侵蚀:对 177 例患者的多中心经验分析。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1151-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2566-z. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
5
Erosions after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: diagnosis and management.腹腔镜可调胃束带术后的蚀斑:诊断与处理。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1047-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826bc21b.
6
Eroded Gastric Band: Where to Next? An Analysis of the Largest Contemporary Series.侵蚀性胃束带:下一步在哪里?对最大当代系列的分析。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jul;30(7):2469-2474. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04610-4.
7
An update on 73 US obese pediatric patients treated with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: comorbidity resolution and compliance data.73例接受腹腔镜可调节胃束带术治疗的美国肥胖儿科患者的最新情况:合并症缓解及依从性数据
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jan;43(1):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.035.
8
Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - 8 years experience.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的术后结果——8年经验
Obes Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):427-34. doi: 10.1381/096089203765887787.
9
Endoscopic management of erosion after banded bariatric procedures.带环减肥手术后的蚀斑内镜处理。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Nov;13(11):1875-1879. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
10
Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature.减重手术后的长期结果:可调胃束带术 15 年随访结果及减重手术文献的系统评价
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):87-94. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b6c02.

引用本文的文献

1
Conversion of a Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in a Case with Gastro-gastric Fistula and Mesh Complication: A Multimedia Article.胃胃瘘和补片并发症病例中失败的垂直束带胃成形术转换为单吻合口胃旁路术:一篇多媒体文章
Obes Surg. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08069-z.
2
Navigating Bariatric Surgery: Understanding and Managing Short-Term and Long-Term Complications.肥胖症手术指南:了解并处理短期和长期并发症
Cureus. 2023 Nov 9;15(11):e48580. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48580. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Management of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Erosion: A Case Report.

本文引用的文献

1
The current science of gastric banding: an overview of pressure-volume theory in band adjustments.胃束带术的当前科学:束带调整中压力-容积理论概述
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May-Jun;4(3 Suppl):S14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.04.003.
2
Studies of Swedish adjustable gastric band and Lap-Band: systematic review and meta-analysis.瑞典可调节胃束带和Lap-Band的研究:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):174-85. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.10.016. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
3
Small bowel obstruction secondary to intragastric erosion and migration of a gastric band.
腹腔镜可调节胃束带侵蚀的管理:一例报告
Cureus. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):e47718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47718. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Surgical Management of Gastrocolic Fistula Formation Due to Simultaneous Gastric and Colonic Erosion of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band: a Case Report.腹腔镜可调节胃束带致胃和结肠同时糜烂引起胃结肠瘘形成的手术治疗:一例报告
Obes Surg. 2023 Dec;33(12):4165-4167. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06845-3. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
5
Staple Line Bacterial Load May Not Be a Contra-Indication to Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Placement During Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy.在初次袖状胃切除术中,吻合线细菌负荷可能并非磁环括约肌增强术置入的禁忌证。
Obes Surg. 2023 Nov;33(11):3703-3705. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06869-9. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
6
Endoscopic Gastric Band Removal.内镜下胃束带移除术。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 12;12(2):617. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020617.
7
Technical Details and Result of a Minimally Invasive Management of Gastric Band Erosions: a Series of 47 Patients.胃带侵蚀微创管理的技术细节和结果:一组 47 例患者。
Obes Surg. 2019 Nov;29(11):3754-3761. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04170-2.
8
Novel Endoscopic Management of Eroding Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band: A Case Series.侵蚀性腹腔镜可调节胃束带的新型内镜管理:病例系列
Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2018 Dec 30;2018:2747852. doi: 10.1155/2018/2747852. eCollection 2018.
9
Cardiogastric Fistula as a Rare Complication After Gastric Banding and Hiatal Hernia Surgery.胃心瘘作为胃束带术和食管裂孔疝手术后的一种罕见并发症
Obes Surg. 2019 Mar;29(3):1023-1027. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03682-7.
10
Early and late complications of bariatric operation.减肥手术的早期和晚期并发症
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Oct 9;3(1):e000219. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000219. eCollection 2018.
胃内侵蚀及胃束带移位继发小肠梗阻
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 May;12(5):983-4. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0304-y. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
4
Hypovolemic shock due to intragastric migration of an adjustable gastric band.可调节胃束带向胃内移位导致的低血容量性休克
Obes Surg. 2007 Apr;17(4):562-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9078-2.
5
Band erosion following gastric banding: how to treat it.胃束带术后束带侵蚀:如何治疗
Obes Surg. 2007 Mar;17(3):329-33. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9060-z.
6
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results.1791例连续肥胖患者的腹腔镜可调节胃束带术:12年随访结果
Obes Surg. 2007 Feb;17(2):168-75. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9043-0.
7
Short- and long-term results of laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity.腹腔镜胃束带术治疗病态肥胖的短期和长期效果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Mar;393(2):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0170-9. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
8
Band erosion and passage, causing small bowel obstruction.束带侵蚀与通过,导致小肠梗阻。
Obes Surg. 2006 Dec;16(12):1679-82. doi: 10.1381/096089206779319446.
9
Exsanguinating hemorrhage following gastric erosion after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术后胃糜烂导致的失血性出血
Obes Surg. 2006 Dec;16(12):1675-8. doi: 10.1381/096089206779319518.
10
Histologic study of tissue reaction to the gastric band: does it contribute to the problem of band erosion?胃束带组织反应的组织学研究:它是否会导致束带侵蚀问题?
Obes Surg. 2006 Sep;16(9):1155-9. doi: 10.1381/096089206778392338.