Zhu Song, Platt Jeffrey A
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Hospital of Stomatology, JiLin University, ChangChun, JiLin, PR China.
Am J Dent. 2009 Dec;22(6):381-6.
To evaluate the influence of different curing distances with three types of lights in terms of the surface microhardness of a resin composite as a function of power density.
90 cylindrical light-cured resin composite specimens were polymerized with three light curing units: (a) Mini LED AutoFocus with a fast curing mode (1955 mW/cm2); (b) LEDemetron I (1541 mW/cm2) and (c) Optilux 401 QTH (1294 mW/cm2) for 40 seconds. Polymerization was performed with the curing tip at a distance of 0 mm, 3.0 mm, 6.0 mm, 9.0 mm, 12.0 mm and 15.0 mm from the top surface of the specimen. 15-25 minutes after photocuring, the top and bottom specimen's surface KHNs were determined. Microhardness values were measured again after 24-hour storage in distilled water in a light proof container at 37 degrees C. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Multiple Comparisons with a Tukey test. The KHNs before and after storage in distilled water were analyzed using a paired t-test. Linear regression analysis was also performed and all statistical analyses were performed at a significance level of 0.05.
There was a linear relationship between the logarithm of the power density and the curing distance. The light curing unit and curing tip distance had a significant effect on the composite microhardness. Specimens cured with the Mini LED AutoFocus light provided higher KHNs than those photoactivated with the LEDemetron I light and Optilux 401 light. There was no statistically significant difference in KHNs between the LEDemetron I group and the Optilux 401 group. The mean Knoop microhardness values decreased significantly as the curing tip distance increased. Fifteen minutes after light cure, effective hardness percent values (> 80%) were achieved in a few experimental groups. A linear correlation was found between the logarithm of the power density and the hardness percent values. Twenty-four hours after light irradiation, most of the experimental groups obtained valid hardness percent values. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the KHN of both the top and bottom surfaces in most of the groups increased significantly. There were no significant increases in the mean relative hardness ratios related to surface or light curing device.
根据功率密度,评估三种类型的光在不同固化距离下对树脂复合材料表面显微硬度的影响。
使用三种光固化设备对90个圆柱形光固化树脂复合材料试样进行聚合:(a)具有快速固化模式(1955 mW/cm²)的Mini LED自动对焦灯;(b)LEDemetron I(1541 mW/cm²)和(c)Optilux 401石英卤钨灯(1294 mW/cm²),固化40秒。固化时,将固化头置于距试样顶面0 mm、3.0 mm、6.0 mm、9.0 mm、12.0 mm和15.0 mm的距离处进行聚合。光固化后15 - 25分钟,测定试样顶面和底面的努氏硬度值(KHNs)。在37℃的避光容器中于蒸馏水中储存24小时后,再次测量显微硬度值。数据进行方差分析和Tukey检验的多重比较。使用配对t检验分析在蒸馏水中储存前后的KHNs。还进行了线性回归分析,所有统计分析均在显著性水平0.05下进行。
功率密度的对数与固化距离之间存在线性关系。光固化设备和固化头距离对复合材料的显微硬度有显著影响。用Mini LED自动对焦灯固化的试样比用LEDemetron I灯和Optilux 401灯光活化的试样具有更高的KHNs。LEDemetron I组和Optilux 401组之间的KHNs没有统计学上的显著差异。随着固化头距离增加,努氏显微硬度平均值显著降低。光固化后十五分钟,少数实验组达到有效硬度百分比值(> 80%)。在功率密度的对数与硬度百分比值之间发现线性相关性。光照射24小时后,大多数实验组获得有效的硬度百分比值。在蒸馏水中储存24小时后,大多数组顶面和底面的KHN均显著增加。与表面或光固化设备相关的平均相对硬度比没有显著增加。