Surgical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute Assiut University, Assiut 7111, Egypt.
Hum Pathol. 2010 Jun;41(6):848-58. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.11.012. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
Overexpression of histone deacetylases has been reported in various human malignancies; however, the expression of histone deacetylases in endometrial tissue is not fully understood. In the present study, the expression of histone deacetylase 1, histone deacetylase 2, and Ki-67 was examined immunohistochemically in 30 normal and 66 malignant endometrial tissue samples. The results were expressed as a positivity index and compared with the positivity index for Ki-67 and rates of patient survival. The effect of 2 histone deacetylase inhibitors, trichostatin A and apicidine, on cell proliferation and the expression of cell cycle regulators such as cyclins (D1, E, and A), p21, p27, and p16 were investigated using 6 endometrial carcinoma cell lines. The positivity index for histone deacetylase 1 (79.8 +/- 33.0, mean +/- SD) and histone deacetylase 2 (106.3 +/- 41.9) was higher in endometrial carcinoma than the normal endometrium, with a significant difference for histone deacetylase 2. The positivity index for histone deacetylase 2 was significantly increased in higher-grade carcinomas (positivity index for grade 3, 124.9 +/- 28.4) compared with grade 1 tumors (86.0 +/- 41.0) and was positively correlated with that for Ki-67. In addition, patients with histone deacetylase 2-positive carcinomas had a poor prognosis compared with those with histone deacetylase 2-negative carcinoma (P = .048). Treatment with trichostatin A or apicidine suppressed the proliferation in all cell lines examined, in association with increased expression of p21 and down-regulation of cyclin D1 and cyclin A expression. These results indicated that increased histone deacetylase 2 expression is involved in the acquisition of aggressive behavior by endometrial carcinoma and suggest histone deacetylase inhibitor to be a promising anticancer drug for this carcinoma.
组蛋白去乙酰化酶的过表达已在多种人类恶性肿瘤中被报道;然而,子宫内膜组织中组蛋白去乙酰化酶的表达尚未完全阐明。在本研究中,通过免疫组织化学方法检测了 30 例正常和 66 例恶性子宫内膜组织样本中组蛋白去乙酰化酶 1、组蛋白去乙酰化酶 2 和 Ki-67 的表达。结果以阳性指数表示,并与 Ki-67 的阳性指数和患者生存率进行了比较。使用 6 种子宫内膜癌细胞系研究了 2 种组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂曲古抑菌素 A 和阿比西定对细胞增殖以及细胞周期调节剂(如细胞周期蛋白(D1、E 和 A)、p21、p27 和 p16)表达的影响。与正常子宫内膜相比,子宫内膜癌中组蛋白去乙酰化酶 1(79.8 +/- 33.0,平均值 +/- SD)和组蛋白去乙酰化酶 2(106.3 +/- 41.9)的阳性指数更高,组蛋白去乙酰化酶 2 的差异具有统计学意义。高级别癌(阳性指数 3 级,124.9 +/- 28.4)中组蛋白去乙酰化酶 2 的阳性指数明显高于 1 级肿瘤(阳性指数 86.0 +/- 41.0),且与 Ki-67 的阳性指数呈正相关。此外,与组蛋白去乙酰化酶 2 阴性癌相比,组蛋白去乙酰化酶 2 阳性癌患者的预后较差(P =.048)。曲古抑菌素 A 或阿比西定的治疗抑制了所有检查的细胞系的增殖,同时增加了 p21 的表达,并下调了细胞周期蛋白 D1 和 A 的表达。这些结果表明,组蛋白去乙酰化酶 2 的表达增加参与了子宫内膜癌获得侵袭性行为,并表明组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂可能是治疗这种癌症的一种有前途的抗癌药物。