Hamdi Amre, Poitras Philippe, Louati Hakim, Dagenais Simon, Masquijo Julio Javier, Kontio Ken
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Mar;30(2):135-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181cfcd14.
Several clinical studies have shown that lateral pinning alone is of equal stability to crossed pins in the treatment of supracondylar fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of parallel and varied divergent lateral pin configurations to provide an easily reproducible technique for optimal pin placement.
Twelve third-generation synthetic composite humeri were osteotomized at the level of the coronoid and olecranon fossae to simulate a humeral supracondylar fracture. Each fracture was reduced and fixed using two 1.6 mm (0.062 inches) Kirschner wires (1 fixed, 1 varied) in 4 different positions (from parallel to divergent with respect to fixed wire), and sequentially tested in extension, varus, and valgus as well as internal and external rotations using an MTS 858 Minibionix materials testing load frame (MTS Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN). A 2-way analysis of variance was carried out to compare construct stiffness in all 5 modes of testing according to both pin position and testing sequence. A level of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The best torsional, valgus, and extension resistances were found with position 4, which was the most divergent configuration. For both internal and external rotations, position 4 showed statistically higher stiffness as compared with all other configurations (P<0.05). In resistance to extension, both positions 3 and 4 were stiffer than either position 1 or 2 (P<0.05). For resistance in varus testing, position 3 showed statistically greater stiffness than all other pin positions (P<0.05). Although there was no statistical difference between all the 4 positions in valgus testing, position 4 showed greater resistance when compared with other positions.
The lateral pin placed parallel to the metaphyseal flare of the lateral humeral cortex, in combination with a second diverging pin crossing the fracture site at the medial edge of the coronoid fossa (position 4), provided the optimum fixation for supracondylar fractures of the humerus.
Using these readily available landmarks, the treating surgeon can reproducibly provide appropriate pinning treatment for most of these fractures.
多项临床研究表明,在治疗肱骨髁上骨折时,单纯外侧穿针与交叉穿针具有同等的稳定性。本研究的目的是比较平行和不同发散角度的外侧穿针构型的稳定性,以提供一种易于重复的最佳穿针放置技术。
将12个第三代合成复合肱骨在冠状窝和鹰嘴窝水平截骨,以模拟肱骨髁上骨折。每个骨折均使用两根1.6毫米(0.062英寸)克氏针(1根固定,1根变化)在4个不同位置(相对于固定针从平行到发散)进行复位和固定,并使用MTS 858 Minibionix材料测试加载框架(MTS公司,明尼苏达州伊甸草原)依次进行伸展、内翻、外翻以及内旋和外旋测试。进行双向方差分析,以根据穿针位置和测试顺序比较所有5种测试模式下的结构刚度。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
在位置4(最发散的构型)发现了最佳的扭转、外翻和伸展阻力。对于内旋和外旋,位置4与所有其他构型相比均显示出统计学上更高的刚度(P<0.05)。在抗伸展方面,位置3和4比位置1或2更硬(P<0.05)。在内翻测试中,位置3显示出比所有其他穿针位置统计学上更大的刚度(P<0.05)。虽然在所有4个位置的外翻测试中没有统计学差异,但位置4与其他位置相比显示出更大的阻力。
与外侧肱骨皮质干骺端 flare 平行放置的外侧针,结合第二根在冠状窝内侧边缘穿过骨折部位的发散针(位置4),为肱骨髁上骨折提供了最佳固定。
利用这些容易获得的标志,治疗外科医生可以为大多数此类骨折可重复地提供适当的穿针治疗。