Park-Klinik Weissensee, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr;105(4):897-903. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.41. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
Although it has been used as a laxative for many years, high-quality trials assessing the efficacy of the laxative sodium picosulfate (SPS) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of 4-week treatment with SPS in patients with functional constipation as defined by the Rome III diagnostic criteria.
This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 45 general practices in Germany. A total of 468 patients with chronic constipation presenting to their general practitioner and fulfilling the Rome III diagnostic criteria were screened. After a 2-week baseline period, 367 patients were randomized to either SPS drops or matching placebo in a 2:1 ratio for 4 weeks. Dose titration was permitted throughout treatment. Patients without a bowel movement for more than 72 h were allowed to use a "rescue" bisacodyl suppository. The primary end point was the mean number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. A spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) was defined as a stool not induced by rescue medication, whereas a CSBM was defined as an SBM associated with a sensation of complete evacuation.
The mean number (+/-s.e.) of CSBMs per week increased from 0.9+/-0.1 to 3.4+/-0.2 in the SPS group and from 1.1+/-0.1 to 1.7+/-0.1 in the placebo group (P<0.0001). The percentage of patients reaching an increase of > or =1 in the mean number of CSBMs per week compared to baseline was 65.5% vs. 32.3%, respectively (P<0.0001). The percentage of patients reaching a mean number of at least three CSBMs per week was 51.1% in the SPS group and 18.0% in the placebo group (P<0.0001). After 24 h, approximately 69% of patients in the SPS group and 53% in the placebo group had their first SBM. The SPS dose was titrated down during the study by nearly 50% of patients. Assessment of quality of life (QoL) by the constipation-related Patient Assessment of Constipation (PAC)-QoL questionnaire showed significant improvement in SPS-treated patients compared to the placebo group.
Treatment of chronic constipation with SPS improves bowel function, symptoms, and QoL and is well tolerated. The dose can be adjusted individually while maintaining benefit.
尽管聚乙二醇(PEG)已被用作泻药多年,但缺乏评估其疗效的高质量试验。本研究的目的是评估匹可硫酸钠(SPS)在符合罗马 III 诊断标准的功能性便秘患者中的 4 周疗效和安全性。
这是一项在德国 45 家普通诊所进行的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究。对因慢性便秘就诊于其全科医生并符合罗马 III 诊断标准的 468 例患者进行了筛选。经过 2 周的基线期后,367 例患者按 2:1 的比例随机分为 SPS 滴剂或匹配的安慰剂组,治疗 4 周。在整个治疗过程中允许剂量滴定。对于超过 72 小时未排便的患者,可以使用“解救”比沙可啶栓剂。主要终点是每周完全自发性排便次数(CSBMs)的平均值。自发性排便(SBM)定义为未使用解救药物诱导的排便,而 CSBM 则定义为与完全排空感相关的 SBM。
SPS 组每周 CSBMs 的平均值从 0.9+/-0.1 增加到 3.4+/-0.2,安慰剂组从 1.1+/-0.1 增加到 1.7+/-0.1(P<0.0001)。与基线相比,每周 CSBMs 增加≥1 的患者比例分别为 65.5%和 32.3%(P<0.0001)。每周至少有 3 次 CSBMs 的患者比例分别为 SPS 组 51.1%和安慰剂组 18.0%(P<0.0001)。治疗后 24 小时,SPS 组约 69%的患者和安慰剂组约 53%的患者首次出现 SBM。研究期间,近 50%的 SPS 组患者和 53%的安慰剂组患者下调了 SPS 剂量。使用便秘相关患者评估便秘问卷(PAC-QoL)评估生活质量(QoL)显示,SPS 治疗组患者的改善明显优于安慰剂组。
用 SPS 治疗慢性便秘可改善肠道功能、症状和生活质量,且耐受性良好。在保持疗效的同时,可以进行个体化剂量调整。