Suppr超能文献

阿特隆 CMC 间隔物与肌腱间置关节成形术的比较。

The Artelon CMC spacer compared with tendon interposition arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Hand Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2010 Apr;81(2):237-44. doi: 10.3109/17453671003635835.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Artelon CMC spacer is designed for surgical treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb (CMC-I). Good results using this degradable device were previously presented in a pilot study. We now present results from a larger randomized, controlled, multicenter study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

109 patients (94 females) with a mean age of 60 (42-83) years, suffering from painful CMC OA, were included in the study at 7 centers in Sweden. The patients were randomized to Artelon CMC spacer (test, n = 72) or tendon arthroplasty (control, n = 37) at a ratio of 2:1. Perceived pain was recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS) before treatment and after 3, 6, and 12 months, when measuring maximal tripod pinch strength (primary outcome measure). In addition, range of motion, radiographic findings, and functional testing were recorded pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Swelling and pain were more common in the test group and 6 implants were removed because of such symptoms. 5 of these patients did not receive antibiotics preoperatively according to the study protocol. In a per-protocol analysis, i.e. patients without signs of concomitant OA in the scaphoid-trapezium-trapezoid (STT) joint and those in the test group who received antibiotics, the mean difference in tripod pinch strength increase, adjusted for baseline, was 1.4 kg in favor of the test group (not statistically significant). Statistically significant pain relief was achieved in both groups, with perceived pain gradually decreasing during the follow-up period. In the intention-to-treat analysis but not in the per-protocol analysis, significantly better pain relief (VAS) was obtained in the control group. Patient-perceived disability evaluated by the DASH questionnaire improved in both groups.

INTERPRETATION

The Artelon CMC spacer did not show superior results compared to tendon interposition arthroplasty. Proper use of preoperative antibiotics and a thorough patient selection appear to be important for the results.

摘要

背景与目的

Artelon CMC 间隔物设计用于治疗拇指腕掌关节(CMC-I)的骨关节炎(OA)。先前的一项初步研究显示,这种可降解装置具有良好的效果。现在我们呈现了一项更大规模的随机、对照、多中心研究的结果。

患者与方法

本研究纳入了 7 家瑞典中心的 109 名(94 名女性)平均年龄为 60(42-83)岁、患有疼痛性 CMC OA 的患者。患者按照 2:1 的比例随机分为 Artelon CMC 间隔物(实验组,n=72)或肌腱关节成形术(对照组,n=37)。在治疗前和治疗后 3、6 和 12 个月时,通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)记录患者的感知疼痛(主要观察指标)。此外,术前和术后还记录了活动范围、影像学发现和功能测试。

结果

实验组肿胀和疼痛更为常见,有 6 个植入物因这些症状而被取出。其中 5 名患者未按照研究方案接受术前抗生素治疗。在符合方案分析中,即无舟状骨-大多角骨-小多角骨(STT)关节合并 OA 征象的患者和实验组中接受抗生素治疗的患者中,调整基线后,实验组的三指捏力增加的平均差值为 1.4kg,有利于实验组(无统计学意义)。两组均获得了显著的疼痛缓解,在随访期间,感知疼痛逐渐减轻。在意向治疗分析中,但不符合方案分析,对照组的疼痛缓解(VAS)明显更好。两组患者的 DASH 问卷评估的患者感知残疾均有所改善。

结论

与肌腱间置关节成形术相比,Artelon CMC 间隔物并未显示出更好的结果。术前抗生素的正确使用和彻底的患者选择似乎对结果很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce96/2895345/c35956c88dc6/ORT-1745-3674-81-237-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验