Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, and Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):60-5. doi: 10.3109/17453671003685418.
There has been a limited amount of research on survival of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We therefore performed a population-based, nationwide study to compare the survival of primary THAs in RA patients and in osteoarthritis (OA) patients. We also wanted to identify predictors of THA failure in RA patients.
Using the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry, we identified 1,661 primary THAs in RA patients and 64,858 in OA patients, all of which were inserted between 1995 and 2008. The follow-up period was up to 14 years for both groups.
Regarding overall THA survival, the adjusted RR for RA patients compared to OA patients was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.65-1.01). We found no difference in survival of cups between primary THAs in RA and OA patients. In contrast, there was better overall survival of stems in RA patients than in OA patients, both regarding revision due to aseptic loosening (adjusted RR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.34-0.99) and for any reason (adjusted RR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.45-0.88). In RA patients, males had a higher risk of revision than females concerning aseptic loosening of the stem, any revision of the stem, and any revision of both components.
The overall survival of primary THAs in RA patients is similar to THA survival in OA patients. Stem survival appeared to be better in RA patients, while survival of the total THA concept did not show any statistically significant differences between the two groups. In RA patients, males appear to have a greater risk of revision than females.
类风湿关节炎(RA)患者全髋关节置换术(THA)的生存情况研究较少。因此,我们进行了一项基于人群的全国性研究,比较 RA 患者和骨关节炎(OA)患者初次 THA 的生存率。我们还希望确定 RA 患者 THA 失败的预测因素。
使用丹麦髋关节置换登记处,我们确定了 1661 例 RA 患者和 64858 例 OA 患者初次 THA,所有患者均于 1995 年至 2008 年间接受手术。两组的随访时间最长为 14 年。
就整体 THA 生存率而言,与 OA 患者相比,RA 患者的调整后 RR 为 0.81(95%CI:0.65-1.01)。我们发现 RA 和 OA 患者初次 THA 之间的髋臼生存率无差异。相反,RA 患者的总体生存率优于 OA 患者,包括无菌性松动引起的翻修(调整后 RR=0.58;95%CI:0.34-0.99)和任何原因引起的翻修(调整后 RR=0.63;95%CI:0.45-0.88)。在 RA 患者中,男性与女性相比,股骨柄无菌性松动、任何股骨柄翻修以及任何组件翻修的风险更高。
RA 患者初次 THA 的总体生存率与 OA 患者相似。股骨柄生存率似乎更好,但两组之间的全髋关节置换术概念的生存率没有统计学上的显著差异。在 RA 患者中,男性的翻修风险似乎高于女性。