Suppr超能文献

系统评价:对乙酰氨基酚诱导的急性肝衰竭的预后检测。

Systematic review: prognostic tests of paracetamol-induced acute liver failure.

机构信息

Department of Hepatology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(10):1064-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04279.x. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) toxicity remains the leading cause of acute liver failure (ALF) in the developed world. In the UK, the recently modified King's College Criteria are used to list patients for emergency liver transplantation, but these criteria have been criticized for their low sensitivity and for spectrum bias in their application.

AIM

To evaluate existing prognostic criteria critically for predicting death without transplantation in paracetamol-induced ALF.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched to identify studies containing adult patients with paracetamol-induced ALF. Selected studies were evaluated and data were pooled if appropriate, to calculate sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of applied prognostic tests.

RESULTS

Of 6507 studies identified, 14 were eligible for inclusion, evaluating 1960 patients. The original King's College Criteria had a pooled sensitivity of 58.2% and specificity of 94.6%, with a DOR of 27.7. Addition of arterial lactate to the King's College Criteria reduced the DOR to 26.1. Several other clinical and laboratory variables had higher DORs than the King's College Criteria, but were only evaluated in single studies of limited quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The original King's College Criteria remain well-validated criteria with high prognostic accuracy. Other potential prognostic variables should be prospectively assessed in multicentre studies to refine the criteria further.

摘要

背景

在发达国家,对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)中毒仍是急性肝衰竭(ALF)的主要原因。在英国,最近修改的国王学院标准被用于将患者列入紧急肝移植名单,但这些标准因敏感性低以及在应用中的谱偏差而受到批评。

目的

批判性地评估现有的预后标准,以预测对乙酰氨基酚诱导的 ALF 患者未经移植的死亡率。

方法

通过 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 搜索,确定包含成人对乙酰氨基酚诱导的 ALF 患者的研究。评估选定的研究,如果合适,则对数据进行汇总,以计算应用的预后试验的敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比(DOR)。

结果

在确定的 6507 项研究中,有 14 项符合纳入标准,共纳入 1960 名患者。原始的国王学院标准的敏感性为 58.2%,特异性为 94.6%,DOR 为 27.7。将动脉乳酸加入到国王学院标准中,将 DOR 降低至 26.1。其他几个临床和实验室变量的 DOR 高于国王学院标准,但仅在质量有限的单中心研究中进行了评估。

结论

原始的国王学院标准仍然是具有高预测准确性的经过良好验证的标准。其他潜在的预后变量应在多中心研究中进行前瞻性评估,以进一步完善这些标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验