Kuethe Friedhelm, Pfeifer Ruediger, Rummler Silke, Bauer Katharina, Kamvissi Virginia, Pfister Wolfgang
Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany; Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum der Carl-Gustav-Carus Universität, Fetscjerstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Cases J. 2009 Apr 20;2:6644. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-0002-0000006644.
Malaria is a potentially life-threatening disease, especially when complicated by a septic shock. When patients present in such a critical condition, the currently available literature allows a dilemma to develop as to which the correct treatment strategy is concerning fluid resuscitation.
A 55-year-old Caucasian man was admitted to the intensive care unit with the clinical picture of severe malaria, brought by a Plasmodium falciparum infection. On admission, the patient was confused, had high fever up to 40 degrees C, and his blood analysis revealed a severe thrombocytopenia, a parasitemia of 25.5%, and biochemical features indicative of severe malaria. The patient received quinine and underwent two automated red cell exchanges by use of a centrifuge-driven cell separator. Two days after admission, the patient developed a septic shock. He received an "early-goal" treatment, according to the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines, which propose fluid resuscitation. The existing recommendations concerning the treatment of severe malaria that favour a restrictive fluid administration were disregarded. Fluid therapy was guided by regular measurements of the central venous pressure, blood pressure and monitoring of the hemodynamic status. The patient survived the shock and the subsequent multiorgan failure, which required mechanical ventilation and dialysis. After 12 days in the intensive care unit and an additional three weeks of hospitalization, the patient was discharged to rehabilitation.
The authors believe that in patients with severe malaria complicated by septic shock, the treatment of sepsis and septic shock should be the one of first priority.
疟疾是一种潜在的危及生命的疾病,尤其是并发感染性休克时。当患者处于这种危急状态时,现有文献对于液体复苏的正确治疗策略会产生两难的情况。
一名55岁的白人男性因严重疟疾的临床表现被收入重症监护病房,由恶性疟原虫感染引起。入院时,患者意识模糊,高烧至40摄氏度,血液分析显示严重血小板减少,疟原虫血症为25.5%,以及提示严重疟疾的生化特征。患者接受了奎宁治疗,并使用离心驱动的细胞分离器进行了两次自动红细胞置换。入院两天后,患者发生感染性休克。根据拯救脓毒症运动指南,他接受了“早期目标”治疗,该指南建议进行液体复苏。关于严重疟疾治疗倾向于限制性液体管理的现有建议被忽视。液体治疗以定期测量中心静脉压、血压和监测血流动力学状态为指导。患者在休克及随后的多器官功能衰竭中存活下来,多器官功能衰竭需要机械通气和透析。在重症监护病房住了12天并额外住院三周后,患者出院接受康复治疗。
作者认为,对于并发感染性休克的严重疟疾患者,脓毒症和感染性休克的治疗应是首要任务。