Maitland Kathryn, Pamba Allan, English Michael, Peshu Norbert, Marsh Kevin, Newton Charles, Levin Michael
The Centre for Geographic Medicine Research, Coast, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kilifi, Kenya.
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Feb 15;40(4):538-45. doi: 10.1086/427505. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
Metabolic acidosis is the best predictor of death in children with severe falciparum malaria; however, its treatment presents a therapeutic dilemma, because acidosis and hypovolemia may coexist with coma, which can be associated with elevated intracranial pressure. We postulated that volume resuscitation with albumin might correct acidosis and hypovolemia with a lower risk of precipitating cerebral edema than crystalloid. In an open-label, randomized, controlled trial, we compared the safety of resuscitation with albumin to saline in Kenyan children with severe malaria.
We randomly assigned children with severe malaria and metabolic acidosis (base deficit, >8 mmol/L) to receive fluid resuscitation with either 4.5% albumin or normal saline. A control (maintenance only) group was only included for patients with a base deficit of <15 mmol/L. The primary outcome measure was the percentage reduction in base deficit at 8 h. Secondary end points included death, the requirement for rescue therapies, and neurological sequelae in survivors.
Of 150 children recruited for the trial, 61 received saline, 56 received albumin, and 33 served as control subjects. There was no significant difference in the resolution of acidosis between the groups; however, the mortality rate was significantly lower among patients who received albumin (3.6% [2 of 56 patients]) than among those who received saline (18% [11 of 61]; relative risk, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-24.8; P=.013).
In high-risk children with severe malaria and acidosis, fluid resuscitation with albumin may reduce mortality. Our study design did not enable us to determine whether saline administration is preferable to fluid restriction or whether saline administration is actually hazardous. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings before definitive treatment recommendations can be made.
代谢性酸中毒是重症恶性疟患儿死亡的最佳预测指标;然而,其治疗存在治疗困境,因为酸中毒和低血容量可能与昏迷并存,而昏迷可能与颅内压升高有关。我们推测,与晶体液相比,用白蛋白进行容量复苏可能纠正酸中毒和低血容量,且引发脑水肿的风险更低。在一项开放标签、随机、对照试验中,我们比较了肯尼亚重症疟疾患儿用白蛋白复苏与用生理盐水复苏的安全性。
我们将患有重症疟疾和代谢性酸中毒(碱缺失>8 mmol/L)的患儿随机分配接受4.5%白蛋白或生理盐水进行液体复苏。仅将碱缺失<15 mmol/L的患者纳入对照组(仅维持治疗)。主要结局指标是8小时时碱缺失降低的百分比。次要终点包括死亡、抢救治疗的需求以及幸存者的神经后遗症。
在招募参加试验的150名儿童中,61名接受生理盐水,56名接受白蛋白,33名作为对照。各组之间酸中毒的缓解情况无显著差异;然而,接受白蛋白的患者死亡率(3.6%[56例患者中的2例])显著低于接受生理盐水的患者(18%[61例中的11例];相对风险为5.5;95%置信区间为1.2 - 24.8;P = 0.013)。
在患有重症疟疾和酸中毒的高危儿童中,用白蛋白进行液体复苏可能降低死亡率。我们的研究设计无法确定给予生理盐水是否优于限制液体摄入,或者给予生理盐水是否实际上有害。在能够做出明确的治疗建议之前,需要进一步研究来证实我们的发现。