Jordan Matthew C
Department of Philosophy, Quincy University, Quincy, IL 62301, USA.
J Med Philos. 2010 Apr;35(2):180-96. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq010. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
The term "human dignity" is the source of considerable confusion in contemporary bioethics. It has been used by Kantians to refer to autonomy, by others to refer to the sanctity of life, and by still others (e.g., the President's Council on Bioethics) to refer-albeit obliquely-to an important but infrequently discussed set of human goods. In the first part of this article, I seek to disambiguate the notion of human dignity. The second part is a defense of the philosophical utility of such a notion; I argue that there is nothing implausible about appealing to a deontological "principle of dignity" to solve bioethical problems, especially those concerning the development of new biotechnologies. There may, however, be problems associated with any attempt to use dignity as a basis for public policy. This sort of worry is explained and briefly addressed in the final section.
“人的尊严”这一术语在当代生物伦理学中造成了相当大的混乱。康德主义者用它来指代自主性,其他人用它来指代生命的神圣性,还有一些人(比如总统生物伦理委员会)则用它来隐晦地指代一组重要但很少被讨论的人类福祉。在本文的第一部分,我试图厘清人的尊严这一概念。第二部分是对这一概念的哲学效用的辩护;我认为诉诸一种道义论的“尊严原则”来解决生物伦理问题,尤其是那些与新生物技术发展相关的问题,并非不合理。然而,将尊严用作公共政策的基础的任何尝试可能都会存在问题。这种担忧将在最后一节中加以解释并简要探讨。