Suppr超能文献

生物伦理学与“人类尊严”。

Bioethics and "human dignity".

作者信息

Jordan Matthew C

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Quincy University, Quincy, IL 62301, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2010 Apr;35(2):180-96. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq010. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

Abstract

The term "human dignity" is the source of considerable confusion in contemporary bioethics. It has been used by Kantians to refer to autonomy, by others to refer to the sanctity of life, and by still others (e.g., the President's Council on Bioethics) to refer-albeit obliquely-to an important but infrequently discussed set of human goods. In the first part of this article, I seek to disambiguate the notion of human dignity. The second part is a defense of the philosophical utility of such a notion; I argue that there is nothing implausible about appealing to a deontological "principle of dignity" to solve bioethical problems, especially those concerning the development of new biotechnologies. There may, however, be problems associated with any attempt to use dignity as a basis for public policy. This sort of worry is explained and briefly addressed in the final section.

摘要

“人的尊严”这一术语在当代生物伦理学中造成了相当大的混乱。康德主义者用它来指代自主性,其他人用它来指代生命的神圣性,还有一些人(比如总统生物伦理委员会)则用它来隐晦地指代一组重要但很少被讨论的人类福祉。在本文的第一部分,我试图厘清人的尊严这一概念。第二部分是对这一概念的哲学效用的辩护;我认为诉诸一种道义论的“尊严原则”来解决生物伦理问题,尤其是那些与新生物技术发展相关的问题,并非不合理。然而,将尊严用作公共政策的基础的任何尝试可能都会存在问题。这种担忧将在最后一节中加以解释并简要探讨。

相似文献

1
Bioethics and "human dignity".生物伦理学与“人类尊严”。
J Med Philos. 2010 Apr;35(2):180-96. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq010. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
2
Enhancement technologies and human identity.增强技术与人类身份。
J Med Philos. 2005 Jun;30(3):261-83. doi: 10.1080/03605310590960166.
6
Immortality.
Commonweal. 2004 Feb 13;131(3):7-8.
8
Bioethics in wartime.
New Atlantis. 2003 Fall;3:23-33.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验