• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

营养丰富食物指数有助于识别健康且价格实惠的食物。

The Nutrient Rich Foods Index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods.

机构信息

Center for Public Health Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-3410, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1095S-1101S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

DOI:10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D
PMID:20181811
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Nutrient Rich Foods (NRF) Index is a formal scoring system that ranks foods on the basis of their nutrient content. When used in conjunction with a food prices database, it can help identify foods that are both nutritious and affordable.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to identify healthy, affordable foods and food groups by using the NRF index and US Department of Agriculture (USDA) nutrient composition and food prices data sets.

DESIGN

Foods in the USDA Food and Nutrition Database for Dietary Studies 1.0 were scored by using the NRF index. This NRF algorithm was represented by the sum of the percentage of the daily values of 9 nutrients to encourage (protein, fiber, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, calcium, iron, magnesium, and potassium) minus the sum of the percentage of the maximum recommended values for 3 nutrients to limit (saturated fat, added sugar, and sodium). NRF scores and mean national food prices were calculated per calorie and per US Food and Drug Administration-defined serving.

RESULTS

Each of the 9 USDA food groups offered foods of diverse nutritive value and cost. Eggs, dry beans and legumes, and meat and milk products were the lowest-cost sources of protein. Milk and milk products were the lowest-cost sources of calcium, whereas vegetables and fruit were the lowest-cost sources of vitamin C. Milk, potatoes, citrus juices, cereals, and beans had more favorable overall nutrient-to-price ratios than did many vegetables and fruit. Energy-dense grains, sweets, and fats provided most of the calories but fewer nutrients per dollar.

CONCLUSION

One important application of nutrient profile models is to help consumers identify foods that provide optimal nutrition at an affordable cost.

摘要

背景

营养丰富食品(NRF)指数是一种正式的评分系统,根据食物的营养成分对其进行排名。当与食品价格数据库结合使用时,它可以帮助确定既营养又实惠的食品。

目的

我们的目的是使用 NRF 指数和美国农业部(USDA)营养成分和食品价格数据集来确定健康、实惠的食品和食品组。

设计

使用 NRF 指数对美国农业部食品和营养数据库膳食研究 1.0 中的食品进行评分。该 NRF 算法由 9 种营养素的每日价值百分比之和表示,以鼓励摄入(蛋白质、纤维、维生素 A、维生素 C、维生素 E、钙、铁、镁和钾)减去 3 种营养素的最大推荐值百分比之和,以限制摄入(饱和脂肪、添加糖和钠)。NRF 得分和平均国家食品价格按每卡路里和美国食品和药物管理局定义的每份计算。

结果

9 个美国农业部食品组中的每一组都提供了具有不同营养价值和成本的食品。鸡蛋、干豆和豆类以及肉类和奶制品是蛋白质的最低成本来源。牛奶和奶制品是钙的最低成本来源,而蔬菜和水果是维生素 C 的最低成本来源。牛奶、土豆、柑橘汁、谷物和豆类的整体营养与价格比优于许多蔬菜和水果。高能量谷物、甜食和脂肪提供了大部分卡路里,但每美元提供的营养成分较少。

结论

营养成分模型的一个重要应用是帮助消费者确定以实惠的价格提供最佳营养的食品。

相似文献

1
The Nutrient Rich Foods Index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods.营养丰富食物指数有助于识别健康且价格实惠的食物。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1095S-1101S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
2
The contribution of milk and milk products to micronutrient density and affordability of the U.S. diet.牛奶和奶制品对美国饮食的微量营养素密度和可负担性的贡献。
J Am Coll Nutr. 2011 Oct;30(5 Suppl 1):422S-8S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2011.10719986.
3
New metrics of affordable nutrition: which vegetables provide most nutrients for least cost?平价营养的新指标:哪些蔬菜的性价比最高?
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Sep;113(9):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 May 25.
4
The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value.美国食品的成本与其营养价值的关系。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Nov;92(5):1181-8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29300. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
5
Effect of a Nutrient Rich Foods consumer education program: results from the nutrition advice study.营养丰富食品消费者教育计划的效果:营养咨询研究结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jan;112(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.031. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
6
Defining nutrient density: development and validation of the nutrient rich foods index.定义营养密度:营养丰富食品指数的制定和验证。
J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Aug;28(4):421S-426S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2009.10718106.
7
Comparing the nutrient rich foods index with "Go," "Slow," and "Whoa," foods.将营养丰富食物指数与“绿灯”“黄灯”和“红灯”食物进行比较。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Feb;111(2):280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.10.045.
8
The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013-16.新型混合营养素密度评分 NRFh 4:3:3 与可负担营养素密度和 2015 年健康饮食指数的关系检验:NHANES 数据 2013-2016 分析。
Nutrients. 2021 May 20;13(5):1734. doi: 10.3390/nu13051734.
9
Nutrient density and affordability of foods in Brazil by food group and degree of processing.巴西各食物组和加工程度的食物营养密度和可负担性。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct;24(14):4564-4571. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004358. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
10
Comparing the cost of essential nutrients from different food sources in the American diet using NHANES 2011-2014.利用 NHANES 2011-2014 数据比较美国饮食中不同食物来源的必需营养素成本。
Nutr J. 2019 Nov 9;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12937-019-0496-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Ancestry Specific Polygenic Risk Score, Dietary Patterns, Physical Activity and Incident Type 2 Diabetes.特定血统的多基因风险评分、饮食模式、身体活动与2型糖尿病发病
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 21:rs.3.rs-7105280. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7105280/v1.
2
Associations between adherence to Japanese food guide spinning top and nutrient density, climate impacts, and monetary cost: findings from the Saitama Prefecture Nutrition Survey 2017.日本食物指南陀螺的遵循情况与营养密度、气候影响及货币成本之间的关联:2017年埼玉县营养调查结果
Eur J Nutr. 2025 Aug 20;64(6):262. doi: 10.1007/s00394-025-03776-w.
3
Assessing Plant-Based Diets in Taiwan Using a Harmonized Food Description-Incorporated Framework.
使用纳入统一食物描述的框架评估台湾地区的植物性饮食。
Nutrients. 2025 Jul 9;17(14):2268. doi: 10.3390/nu17142268.
4
Sustainability diet index: a multi-criteria decision analysis proposal for culinary preparations-A case study.可持续饮食指数:烹饪准备的多标准决策分析建议——一个案例研究
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 9;12:1586886. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1586886. eCollection 2025.
5
Global Comparison and Future Trends of Major Food Proteins: Can Shellfish Contribute to Sustainable Food Security?主要食物蛋白质的全球比较与未来趋势:贝类能否助力可持续粮食安全?
Foods. 2025 Jun 23;14(13):2205. doi: 10.3390/foods14132205.
6
Menu Dilemmas: An Integrated Assessment of the Nutritional Quality, Environmental Impact, and Cost of Vegan, Vegetarian, and Meat-Based Versions of Meals.菜单困境:对纯素、素食和肉类餐食版本的营养质量、环境影响及成本的综合评估
Nutrients. 2025 May 2;17(9):1569. doi: 10.3390/nu17091569.
7
Mercury Level in Worldwide Poultry Food Products: a Systematic Review.全球家禽食品中的汞含量:一项系统评价。
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1007/s12011-025-04659-1.
8
Defining the role of processing in food classification systems-the IUFoST formulation & processing approach.界定加工在食品分类系统中的作用——国际食品科学技术联盟的制定与加工方法。
NPJ Sci Food. 2025 Apr 23;9(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41538-025-00395-x.
9
The measurement of dietary species richness reveals that a higher consumption of dietary fibre, fish, fruits and vegetables, is associated with greater food biodiversity in UK diets.对饮食物种丰富度的测量表明,在英国饮食中,膳食纤维、鱼类、水果和蔬菜的摄入量越高,食物生物多样性就越高。
Public Health Nutr. 2025 Apr 11;28(1):e76. doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000473.
10
Application of Nordic Keyhole and Nutri-Score for assessment of nutritional quality of plant-based dairy analogues.应用北欧锁孔模型和营养评分评估植物基乳制品类似物的营养质量。
BMC Nutr. 2025 Feb 28;11(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-01023-3.