University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 801 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jan;112(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.031. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
The Nutrient Rich Foods (NRF) approach to eating uses the NRF Index, a nutrient profiling metric to help consumers choose foods that contain more vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients per kilocalorie. Research is needed to test the efficacy of dietary guidance using nutrient profiling systems to rank foods.
To examine whether nutrition education and supporting materials would increase understanding of the NRF approach and improve food shopping, meal planning, consumption of nutrient-rich foods, and diet quality.
Unbalanced randomized controlled trial conducted in February to May 2009 with participants assigned to NRF education group (n=128) or control group receiving standard nutrition education (n=61).
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Adult primary food shoppers and preparers with at least one child in the household aged 3 to 17 years.
Group education session and support tools (pocket guide, shopping list, refrigerator magnet, weekly e-mail messages, and biweekly mailings).
Surveys of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors and two 24-hour telephone dietary recalls at baseline and after an 8-week intervention period.
Examined time-by-treatment interactions in outcome measures.
Compared to controls, NRF participants increased meal planning (+24.2% vs ?4.9%; P<0.01), ability to identify nutrient-rich foods (+60.2% vs +24.6%; P<0.001), and use of shopping lists (+14.1% vs +3.3%; nonsignificant trend), and consumed more vegetables and fruits (P<0.05). NRF participants improved overall diet quality as shown by their scores on the Healthy Eating Index (P=0.04) and NRF scale scores (nonsignificant trend). Significant improvements were observed in Healthy Eating Index component scores for total fruit; whole fruit; whole grains; saturated fat; and energy from solid fats, alcohol, and added sugars.
Findings of this study showed that a consumer education program increased participants' use of the NRF approach and improved diet quality. Larger and longer-term studies are needed to confirm the findings and better understand processes of change.
营养丰富食品(NRF)饮食法采用 NRF 指数这一营养成分分析指标,帮助消费者选择每卡路里热量含有更多维生素、矿物质和其他营养成分的食品。需要研究使用营养成分分析系统对食品进行分级的饮食指导的效果。
检验营养教育和支持材料是否能增强对 NRF 方法的理解,并改善食品采购、膳食计划、营养丰富食品的消费和饮食质量。
2009 年 2 月至 5 月进行的非均衡随机对照试验,参与者被分配到 NRF 教育组(n=128)或接受标准营养教育的对照组(n=61)。
参与者/设置:有至少一名 3 至 17 岁儿童的家庭的成年主要食品购买者和准备者。
小组教育课程和支持工具(袖珍指南、购物清单、冰箱磁铁、每周电子邮件和双周邮件)。
基线和 8 周干预期后的知识、态度和行为调查以及两次 24 小时电话饮食回忆。
检验了结果测量中的时间-治疗交互作用。
与对照组相比,NRF 组参与者增加了膳食计划(+24.2% vs?4.9%;P<0.01)、识别营养丰富食品的能力(+60.2% vs +24.6%;P<0.001)和使用购物清单(+14.1% vs +3.3%;无显著趋势),并增加了蔬菜和水果的摄入量(P<0.05)。NRF 参与者的整体饮食质量也有所改善,其健康饮食指数(P=0.04)和 NRF 评分(无显著趋势)得分均有所提高。健康饮食指数成分得分在总水果、全水果、全谷物、饱和脂肪和固体脂肪、酒精和添加糖的能量方面有显著改善。
本研究结果表明,消费者教育计划增加了参与者对 NRF 方法的使用并改善了饮食质量。需要更大和更长时间的研究来证实这些发现,并更好地了解变化的过程。