Ophthalmic Research Laboratories, South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Hanson Institute Centre for Neurological Diseases, Adelaide, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jul;51(7):3774-83. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4305. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
PURPOSE. Although the RGC-5 cell line is widely used in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) research, recent data have raised questions about the nature of these cells. The authors performed a systematic analysis of RGC-5 cells to determine which RGC or neuronal markers are expressed after treatment with known differentiating agents, thus providing further insight into the nature of these cells and assisting in defining their future use. METHODS. RGC-5 cells were treated for 5 days with staurosporine (STSN; 316 nM), trichostatin A (TSA; 500 nM), or succinyl-concanavalin A (sConA; 50 microg/mL), after which they were assayed for specific marker antigen/mRNA expression. Treated cells were also assayed for excitotoxic responsiveness. RESULTS. Neither treated nor untreated RGC-5 cells expressed any specific RGC marker mRNAs or proteins (Brn-3, neurofilaments, Thy-1) or calbindin, calretinin, synaptophysin, PKCalpha, or glial fibrillary acidic protein. However, control RGC-5 cells did express the neuronal markers tau, betaIII-tubulin, microtubule-associated protein (MAP)-1b, MAP2, and PGP9.5. Although treatment with sConA had no effect on the expression of these markers, STSN and (dose dependently) TSA increased their expression and induced excitotoxic responsiveness. All cells, treated or not, expressed high levels of nestin but no other progenitor cell markers. All cells also expressed cone-specific, but not rod-specific, opsin indicative of cone photoreceptor lineage. CONCLUSIONS. RGC-5 cells expressed neuronal, but not RGC-specific, markers that were dose dependently upregulated by TSA. Hence, TSA provided the best tested means to terminally differentiate the cells to a neuronal phenotype from a precursor-like lineage.
目的。虽然 RGC-5 细胞系广泛应用于视网膜神经节细胞 (RGC) 研究,但最近的数据对这些细胞的性质提出了质疑。作者对 RGC-5 细胞进行了系统分析,以确定在用已知分化剂处理后表达哪些 RGC 或神经元标记物,从而进一步了解这些细胞的性质,并有助于确定它们的未来用途。
方法。用 staurosporine (STSN; 316 nM)、trichostatin A (TSA; 500 nM) 或 succinyl-concanavalin A (sConA; 50 μg/mL) 处理 RGC-5 细胞 5 天,然后检测特定标记抗原/mRNA 的表达。还检测了处理细胞的兴奋性反应性。
结果。无论是处理过的还是未处理的 RGC-5 细胞都没有表达任何特定的 RGC 标记物 mRNA 或蛋白 (Brn-3、神经丝、Thy-1) 或钙结合蛋白、钙调蛋白、突触小体相关蛋白、PKCalpha 或神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白。然而,对照 RGC-5 细胞确实表达了神经元标记物 tau、βIII-微管蛋白、微管相关蛋白 (MAP)-1b、MAP2 和 PGP9.5。虽然 sConA 处理对这些标记物的表达没有影响,但 STSN 和 (剂量依赖性地) TSA 增加了它们的表达并诱导了兴奋性反应性。所有细胞,无论是否处理,都表达高水平的巢蛋白,但没有其他祖细胞标记物。所有细胞还表达了视锥特异性但视杆特异性 opsin,表明视锥光感受体谱系。
结论。RGC-5 细胞表达神经元标记物,但不表达 RGC 特异性标记物,TSA 可剂量依赖性地上调这些标记物。因此,TSA 提供了最好的测试手段,可使细胞从前体细胞样谱系向神经元表型终末分化。