Cemagref, UR HBAN, Parc de Tourvoie, BP 44, F-92163, Antony Cedex, France.
Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(4):825-39. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.898.
The quality of simulation results can be significantly affected by errors in the published model (typing, inconsistencies, gaps or conceptual errors) and/or in the underlying numerical model description. Seven of the most commonly used activated sludge models have been investigated to point out the typing errors, inconsistencies and gaps in the model publications: ASM1; ASM2d; ASM3; ASM3 + Bio-P; ASM2d + TUD; New General; UCTPHO+. A systematic approach to verify models by tracking typing errors and inconsistencies in model development and software implementation is proposed. Then, stoichiometry and kinetic rate expressions are checked for each model and the errors found are reported in detail. An attached spreadsheet (see http://www.iwaponline.com/wst/06104/0898.pdf) provides corrected matrices with the calculations of all stoichiometric coefficients for the discussed biokinetic models and gives an example of proper continuity checks.
模拟结果的质量可能会受到发布模型（输入错误、不一致、漏洞或概念性错误）和/或基础数值模型描述中的错误的显著影响。为了指出模型出版物中的输入错误、不一致和漏洞，对七种最常用的活性污泥模型进行了研究：ASM1；ASM2d；ASM3；ASM3 + Bio-P；ASM2d + TUD；New General；UCTPHO+。提出了一种通过跟踪模型开发和软件实现中的输入错误和不一致来验证模型的系统方法。然后，对每个模型进行化学计量和动力学速率表达式的检查，并详细报告发现的错误。一个附加的电子表格（请参见 http://www.iwaponline.com/wst/06104/0898.pdf）提供了经修正的矩阵，其中包含了所讨论生物动力学模型的所有化学计量系数的计算，并给出了正确的连续性检查示例。
