一项比较五种放射性标记的蛙皮素类似物靶向前列腺癌效果的标准化研究。
A standardised study to compare prostate cancer targeting efficacy of five radiolabelled bombesin analogues.
机构信息
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Jul;37(7):1386-96. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1388-2. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
PURPOSE
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PC) has dramatically increased early diagnosis. Current imaging techniques are not optimal to stage early PC adequately. A promising alternative to PC imaging is peptide-based scintigraphy using radiolabelled bombesin (BN) analogues that bind to gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) being overexpressed in PC. When labelled to appropriate radionuclides BN targeting of GRPRs may also provide applications for peptide radionuclide receptor therapy (PRRT). Assessment studies under identical experimental conditions allowing a reliable comparison of the potential of such analogues are lacking. This study was performed to evaluate and directly compare five promising radiolabelled BN analogues for their targeting efficacy for PC under standardised conditions.
METHODS
The BN agonists [(111)In]DOTA-PESIN, [(111)In]AMBA, [(111)In]MP2346 and [(111)In]MP2653 and one antagonist [(99m)Tc]Demobesin-1 were evaluated in GRPR-overexpressing human PC-3 tumour-bearing mice to determine peptide stability in vivo, biodistribution and GRPR targeting potential by animal SPECT/CT imaging and ex vivo autoradiography.
RESULTS
HPLC analysis of blood showed intact Demobesin-1 at 5 and 15 min after injection (64.1 +/- 1.6% and 41.0 +/- 01%, respectively) being much less for the other compounds. AMBA, the second most stable analogue, showed 36.1 +/- 2.7% and 9.8 +/- 1.1% intact peptide after 5 and 15 min. PC-3 tumour uptake at 1 h was comparable for Demobesin-1, AMBA, PESIN and MP2346 (3.0 +/- 0.4, 2.7 +/- 0.5, 2.3 +/- 0.5 and 2.1 +/- 0.9%ID/g, respectively), but very low for MP2653 (0.9 +/- 0.2%ID/g). In addition, MP2346 showed undesirably high uptake in the kidneys (7.9 +/- 1.9%ID/g) being significantly less for the other analogues. AMBA, MP2346 and PESIN revealed favourable increases in tumour to blood ratios over time while changes in tumour to kidney and pancreas ratios for Demobesin-1 from 1 to 24 h after injection were significantly better than for the other analogues. All analogues visualised PC-3 tumours by SPECT/CT and autoradiography.
CONCLUSION
In the present study the BN antagonist Demobesin-1 was the best performing analogue showing superior in vivo stability, highest tumour uptake and retention while pancreatic and renal clearance were rapid. PESIN and AMBA were the best GRP agonists with sufficient in vivo stabilities as well as high tumour uptake and retention. Based on these results all three analogues deserve further evaluation for clinical use in PC patients.
目的
基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的前列腺癌(PC)筛查极大地提高了早期诊断的水平。目前的成像技术不能充分对早期 PC 进行分期。一种有前途的 PC 成像替代方法是使用放射性标记的蛙皮素(BN)类似物进行肽基闪烁显像,该类似物与胃泌素释放肽受体(GRPR)结合,而 GRPR 在 PC 中过度表达。当与适当的放射性核素标记时,BN 对 GRPR 的靶向作用也可能为肽放射性核素受体治疗(PRRT)提供应用。在缺乏允许对这些类似物的潜力进行可靠比较的相同实验条件下进行评估研究。本研究旨在评估和直接比较五种有前途的放射性标记 BN 类似物在标准条件下用于 PC 的靶向功效。
方法
在 GRPR 过表达的人 PC-3 肿瘤荷瘤小鼠中评估 BN 激动剂 [111In]DOTA-PESIN、[111In]AMBA、[111In]MP2346 和 [111In]MP2653 以及一种拮抗剂 [99mTc]Demobesin-1,以确定肽在体内的稳定性、生物分布和 GRPR 靶向潜力,通过动物 SPECT/CT 成像和离体放射自显影进行评估。
结果
HPLC 分析表明,注射后 5 和 15 分钟时,完整的 Demobesin-1 分别为 64.1 +/- 1.6%和 41.0 +/- 01%(分别为 64.1 +/- 1.6%和 41.0 +/- 01%),而其他化合物的含量要少得多。第二稳定的 AMBA 类似物在 5 和 15 分钟后分别显示 36.1 +/- 2.7%和 9.8 +/- 1.1%的完整肽。Demobesin-1、AMBA、PESIN 和 MP2346 在 1 小时时在 PC-3 肿瘤中的摄取量相当(分别为 3.0 +/- 0.4、2.7 +/- 0.5、2.3 +/- 0.5 和 2.1 +/- 0.9%ID/g),但 MP2653 的摄取量非常低(0.9 +/- 0.2%ID/g)。此外,MP2346 在肾脏中的摄取量(7.9 +/- 1.9%ID/g)过高,明显低于其他类似物。AMBA、MP2346 和 PESIN 随着时间的推移显示出肿瘤与血液比的有利增加,而注射后 1 至 24 小时时 Demobesin-1 的肿瘤与肾脏和胰腺比的变化明显优于其他类似物。所有类似物均通过 SPECT/CT 和放射自显影显示出 PC-3 肿瘤。
结论
在本研究中,BN 拮抗剂 Demobesin-1 是表现最佳的类似物,具有优越的体内稳定性、最高的肿瘤摄取和保留,同时具有快速的胰腺和肾脏清除率。PESIN 和 AMBA 是最好的 GRP 激动剂,具有足够的体内稳定性以及高肿瘤摄取和保留。基于这些结果,所有三种类似物都值得进一步评估,以用于 PC 患者的临床应用。