• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圈养郊狼与野生郊狼的比较:环境富集有用吗?

Captive coyotes compared to their counterparts in the wild: does environmental enrichment help?

作者信息

Shivik John A, Palmer Gemma L, Gese Eric M, Osthaus Britta

机构信息

USDA Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center, Logan, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2009;12(3):223-35. doi: 10.1080/10888700902955989.

DOI:10.1080/10888700902955989
PMID:20183476
Abstract

This article attempts to determine the effects of environment (captive or wild) and a simple form of environmental enrichment on the behavior and physiology of a nonhuman animal. Specifically, analyses first compared behavioral budgets and stereotypic behavior of captive coyotes (Canis latrans) in kennels and pens to their counterparts in the wild. Second, experiments examined the effect of a simple form of environmental enrichment for captive coyotes (food-filled bones) on behavioral budgets, stereotypies, and corticosteroid levels. Overall, behavioral budgets of captive coyotes in both kennels and pens were similar to those observed in the wild, but coyotes in captivity exhibited significantly more stereotypic behavior. Intermittently providing a bone generally lowered resting and increased foraging behaviors but did not significantly reduce stereotypic behavior or alter corticosteroid levels. Thus, coyote behavior in captivity can be similar to that exhibited in the wild; in addition, although enrichment can affect proportions of elicited behaviors, abnormal behaviors and corticosteroid levels may require more than a simple form of environmental enrichment for their reduction.

摘要

本文试图确定环境(圈养或野生)以及一种简单形式的环境富集对一种非人类动物的行为和生理的影响。具体而言,分析首先比较了圈养在犬舍和围栏中的郊狼(犬属)与野生郊狼的行为预算和刻板行为。其次,实验研究了一种简单形式的环境富集(装满食物的骨头)对圈养郊狼的行为预算、刻板行为和皮质类固醇水平的影响。总体而言,犬舍和围栏中圈养郊狼的行为预算与在野外观察到的相似,但圈养的郊狼表现出明显更多的刻板行为。间歇性地提供骨头通常会降低休息行为并增加觅食行为,但并没有显著减少刻板行为或改变皮质类固醇水平。因此,圈养郊狼的行为可以与野生郊狼的行为相似;此外,尽管环境富集可以影响引发行为的比例,但减少异常行为和皮质类固醇水平可能需要不止一种简单形式的环境富集。

相似文献

1
Captive coyotes compared to their counterparts in the wild: does environmental enrichment help?圈养郊狼与野生郊狼的比较:环境富集有用吗?
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2009;12(3):223-35. doi: 10.1080/10888700902955989.
2
Effects of guest feeding programs on captive giraffe behavior.访客投喂计划对圈养长颈鹿行为的影响。
Zoo Biol. 2016 Mar-Apr;35(2):157-66. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21275. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
3
Introducing a semi-naturalistic exhibit as structural enrichment for two brown bears (Ursus arctos). Does this ensure their captive well-being?引入一个半自然主义展览作为两只棕熊( Ursus arctos)的环境富集设施。这能确保它们在圈养环境中的福祉吗?
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2006;9(4):299-314. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0904_5.
4
Environmental enrichment to address behavioral differences between wild and captive black-and-white ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata).通过环境富集来解决野生和圈养黑白领狐猴(Varecia variegata)之间的行为差异。
Am J Primatol. 2005 May;66(1):71-84. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20128.
5
Implementing unpredictability in feeding enrichment for Malayan sun bears (Helarctos malayanus).在马来貘(马来熊,学名Helarctos malayanus)的食物丰富化中实现不可预测性。
Zoo Biol. 2014 Jan-Feb;33(1):54-62. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21112. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Environmental effects on the behavior of zoo-housed lions and tigers, with a case study of the effects of a visual barrier on pacing.环境对圈养狮子和老虎行为的影响,以视觉屏障对踱步行为的影响为例的案例研究
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2007;10(2):95-109. doi: 10.1080/10888700701313116.
7
Habituation to environmental enrichment in captive sloth bears--effect on stereotypies.圈养懒熊对环境富集的习惯化——对刻板行为的影响
Zoo Biol. 2010 Nov-Dec;29(6):705-14. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20301.
8
Effect of environmental enrichment devices on behaviors of single- and group-housed squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).环境富集装置对单笼和群养松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)行为的影响
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1997 May;36(3):72-5.
9
An empirical case study examining effectiveness of environmental enrichment in two captive Australian Sea Lions (Neophoca cinerea).一项实证案例研究,考察环境富集对两只圈养澳大利亚海狮(新海狮属)的有效性。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2010;13(2):103-22. doi: 10.1080/10888700903371863.
10
Activity budgets and the relationship between feeding and stereotypic behaviors in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in a Zoo.动物园中亚洲象(印度象)的活动预算以及进食行为与刻板行为之间的关系。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Mar;28(2):79-97. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20200.

引用本文的文献

1
Binding Affinity, Selectivity, and Pharmacokinetics of the Oxytocin Receptor Antagonist L-368,899 in the Coyote ().在郊狼()中,催产素受体拮抗剂 L-368,899 的结合亲和力、选择性和药代动力学。
Comp Med. 2024 Feb 1;74(1):3-11. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-23-000044.
2
Integrating Measures of Fecal Glucocorticoid Metabolites and Giving-Up Densities to Assess Adrenocortical Activity and Well-Being in Zoo-Housed Three-Banded Armadillos ().整合粪便糖皮质激素代谢物测量值和放弃密度以评估圈养三带犰狳的肾上腺皮质活动和健康状况()
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 13;13(12):1975. doi: 10.3390/ani13121975.
3
Integrating robotics into wildlife conservation: testing improvements to predator deterrents through movement.
将机器人技术融入野生动物保护:通过运动测试对捕食者威慑物的改进。
PeerJ. 2023 Jun 1;11:e15491. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15491. eCollection 2023.
4
Scavenging hunting affects behavioral traits of an opportunistic carnivore.清道夫式捕猎影响一种机会主义捕食者的行为特征。
PeerJ. 2022 May 2;10:e13366. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13366. eCollection 2022.
5
Environmental Display Can Buffer the Effect of Pesticides on Solitary Bees.环境展示可缓冲农药对独居蜜蜂的影响。
Insects. 2020 Jul 5;11(7):417. doi: 10.3390/insects11070417.
6
Interactions with humans shape coyote responses to hazing.与人类的互动塑造了郊狼对恐吓的反应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56524-6.
7
Persistence and conspecific observations improve problem-solving abilities of coyotes.坚持和同类观察能提高郊狼的解决问题能力。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0218778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218778. eCollection 2019.
8
The influence of complex and threatening environments in early life on brain size and behaviour.早年复杂且充满威胁的环境对大脑大小和行为的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 27;283(1823). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2564.