Prymka M, Hassenpflug J
Orthopädische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2009 Nov-Dec;147(6):675-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1186059. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
In our prospective study we evaluated the clinical and radiological results of 36 patients who had a robot-assisted implantation of a cementless hip endoprosthesis.
All patients underwent a standardised examination preoperatively, 1 year after the operation and 6 years postoperatively. We evaluated the pain of the patients with the help of a visual analogue scale, the range of motion of the hip joint and subjective and objective parameters according to the Harris hip score and the Merle d'Aubigné score. With X-rays loosenings and movement of the stems were evaluated. All patients were operated by the same team.
The clinical results were very good. A highly significant pain reduction could be documented. We also saw a significant improvement in the range of motion and the hip scores. In 1 case a loosening of the stem happened after 5 years, in another patient the stem broke out a few days after implantation. The reason for this was not a mistake of the robot but the wrong preoperative planning. Other complications were not observed.
Considering the good biochemical results in the literature, our study suggests good long-term results after robot-assisted hip surgery. The drawbacks and complications of robot-assisted hip surgery, which were documented especially in the popular press, cannot be confirmed.
在我们的前瞻性研究中,我们评估了36例行机器人辅助无骨水泥型髋关节假体植入术患者的临床和影像学结果。
所有患者在术前、术后1年和术后6年均接受标准化检查。我们借助视觉模拟量表评估患者的疼痛情况,根据Harris髋关节评分和Merle d'Aubigné评分评估髋关节活动范围以及主观和客观参数。通过X线评估假体柄的松动和移位情况。所有患者均由同一团队进行手术。
临床结果非常好。可以证明疼痛有显著减轻。我们还观察到活动范围和髋关节评分有显著改善。1例患者在术后5年出现假体柄松动,另1例患者在植入后几天假体柄断裂。原因并非机器人操作失误,而是术前规划错误。未观察到其他并发症。
鉴于文献中良好的生物化学结果,我们的研究表明机器人辅助髋关节手术后有良好的长期效果。尤其是大众媒体所报道的机器人辅助髋关节手术的缺点和并发症无法得到证实。