Sanei B, Mahmoodieh M, Masoudpour H
Department of General Surgery, Saint Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Acta Chir Belg. 2009 Nov-Dec;109(6):727-30. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680524.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of topical glycerol trinitrate ointment (GTN) with topical diltiazem hydrochloride ointment (DTZ) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.
Prospectively, 102 patients were treated randomly with either GTN ointment (0.2%) or DTZ ointment (2%) a couple of times daily for 12 weeks.
Forty-five patients (88.2%) in group DTZ and 36 patients (70.6%) in group GTZ had a reduction of symptoms. The decrease in the symptoms for group DTZ was significantly more than for group GTN (P = 0.02). Mean time for symptom reduction was 2.44 +/- 0.30 in group DTZ and 2.50 +/- 0.28 weeks in group GTN with no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Complete relief of symptoms was observed in 72.5% and 54.9% patients in groups DTZ and GTN, respectively. The frequency of complete relief of symptoms between the two groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Complete remission of anal fissure occurred in 66.7% patients in group DTZ and 54.9% patients in group GTN, which shows no significant difference. Mean time taken for fissure healing in the GTN group was dramatically less than in the DTZ group (P = 0.001). Finally, 33.3% of patients in the DTZ group and 45.1% of patients in the GTN group underwent operation. The need for operation was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Both DTZ and GTN are equally effective and can be the preferred first-line treatment of chronic anal fissure. However, GTN is associated with a higher rate of headache, and should be replaced by DTZ.
本研究旨在比较局部应用硝酸甘油软膏(GTN)与局部应用盐酸地尔硫䓬软膏(DTZ)治疗慢性肛裂的效果。
前瞻性地将102例患者随机分为两组,分别每日数次外用0.2%的GTN软膏或2%的DTZ软膏,持续12周。
DTZ组45例患者(88.2%)症状减轻,GTZ组36例患者(70.6%)症状减轻。DTZ组症状减轻程度显著高于GTN组(P = 0.02)。DTZ组症状减轻的平均时间为2.44±0.30周,GTN组为2.50±0.28周,两组间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。DTZ组和GTN组分别有72.5%和54.9%的患者症状完全缓解。两组间症状完全缓解的频率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。DTZ组66.7%的患者肛裂完全愈合,GTN组54.9%的患者肛裂完全愈合,差异无统计学意义。GTN组肛裂愈合的平均时间显著短于DTZ组(P = 0.001)。最后,DTZ组33.3%的患者和GTN组45.1%的患者接受了手术。两组间手术需求无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
DTZ和GTN同样有效,均可作为慢性肛裂的首选一线治疗方法。然而,GTN引起头痛的发生率较高,应由DTZ替代。