Suppr超能文献

腰麻-全麻联合阻滞与硬膜外-全麻联合阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较

Comparison of combined spinal and general anesthesia block and combined epidural and general anesthesia block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Calvo-Soto Patricia, Trujillo-Hernández Benjamín, Martínez-Contreras Alicia, Vásquez Clemente

机构信息

Departamento de Anestesiología, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Hospital General de Zona y Medicina Familiar No. 1 de Colima.

出版信息

Rev Invest Clin. 2009 Nov-Dec;61(6):482-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Combined spinal and general anesthesia block (CSGAB) and combined epidural and general anesthesia block (CEGAB) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy were compared.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty patients were randomly selected (ASA physical status I-II) to receive sevoflurane plus 10 to 15 mg of bupivacaine weighed at 0.5% and 20 microg of fentanyl (CSGAB) or sevoflurane plus 150 mg of ropivacaine and 1 microg/kg of fentanyl (CEGAB). Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen and carbon dioxide saturation, drug doses and sevoflurane MAC (minimum alveolar concentration) were evaluated during surgery. Anesthesia recovery time and pain intensity and duration were evaluated during the first two postoperative hours. Frequency of incisional or referred pain, dyspnea, headache, cramping, nausea and vomiting were evaluated 24 hours after surgery. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Chi-square test and Student t test. Relative risk, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat (NNT) for adverse reactions were determined.

RESULTS

Systolic and diastolic arterial pressures posterior to semi-Fowler's position were lower in the CSGAB group than in the CEGAB group. (94 +/- 16 vs. 110 +/- 18 mmHg; p < 0.01 and 59 +/- 8 vs. 69 +/- 12, mmHg; p < 0.01, respectively). Anesthesia recovery time (32 +/- 17 vs. 61 +/- 29 minutes; p < 0.01) and pain duration (26 +/- 42 vs. 83 +/- 46 minutes; p < 0.01) were shorter in the CSGAB group. NNT was 8 for postoperative pain, 8 for nausea, and 95 for vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

CSGAB was more efficacious for rapid anesthesia recovery and had a shorter post-operative pain duration than CEGAB.

摘要

目的

比较腰麻联合全身麻醉(CSGAB)和硬膜外麻醉联合全身麻醉(CEGAB)在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的效果。

材料与方法

随机选取40例患者(ASA身体状况分级为I-II级),分别接受七氟醚加0.5%浓度的10至15毫克重比重布比卡因和20微克芬太尼(CSGAB),或七氟醚加150毫克罗哌卡因和1微克/千克芬太尼(CEGAB)。术中评估血压、心率、血氧和二氧化碳饱和度、药物剂量及七氟醚最低肺泡浓度(MAC)。术后前两小时评估麻醉恢复时间、疼痛强度及持续时间。术后24小时评估切口或牵涉痛、呼吸困难、头痛、痉挛、恶心和呕吐的发生率。采用卡方检验和学生t检验进行统计学分析。确定不良反应的相对风险、绝对风险降低率及需治疗人数(NNT)。

结果

半卧位后CSGAB组的收缩压和舒张压低于CEGAB组。(分别为94±16 vs. 110±18 mmHg;p<0.01和59±8 vs. 69±12 mmHg;p<0.01)。CSGAB组的麻醉恢复时间(32±17 vs. 61±29分钟;p<0.01)和疼痛持续时间(得26±42 vs. 83±46分钟;p<0.01)更短。术后疼痛的NNT为8,恶心为8,呕吐为95。

结论

与CEGAB相比,CSGAB在麻醉快速恢复方面更有效,术后疼痛持续时间更短。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验