• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手卫生不合规与医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的成本。

Hand hygiene noncompliance and the cost of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):357-64. doi: 10.1086/651096.

DOI:10.1086/651096
PMID:20184440
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hand hygiene noncompliance is a major cause of nosocomial infection. Nosocomial infection cost data exist, but the effect of hand hygiene noncompliance is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-related cost of an incident of hand hygiene noncompliance by a healthcare worker during patient care.

DESIGN

Two models were created to simulate sequential patient contacts by a hand hygiene-noncompliant healthcare worker. Model 1 involved encounters with patients of unknown MRSA status. Model 2 involved an encounter with an MRSA-colonized patient followed by an encounter with a patient of unknown MRSA status. The probability of new MRSA infection for the second patient was calculated using published data. A simulation of 1 million noncompliant events was performed. Total costs of resulting infections were aggregated and amortized over all events.

SETTING

Duke University Medical Center, a 750-bed tertiary medical center in Durham, North Carolina.

RESULTS

Model 1 was associated with 42 MRSA infections (infection rate, 0.0042%). Mean infection cost was $47,092 (95% confidence interval [CI], $26,040-$68,146); mean cost per noncompliant event was $1.98 (95% CI, $0.91-$3.04). Model 2 was associated with 980 MRSA infections (0.098%). Mean infection cost was $53,598 (95% CI, $50,098-$57,097); mean cost per noncompliant event was $52.53 (95% CI, $47.73-$57.32). A 200-bed hospital incurs $1,779,283 in annual MRSA infection-related expenses attributable to hand hygiene noncompliance. A 1.0% increase in hand hygiene compliance resulted in annual savings of $39,650 to a 200-bed hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand hygiene noncompliance is associated with significant attributable hospital costs. Minimal improvements in compliance lead to substantial savings.

摘要

背景

手部卫生不合规是医院感染的主要原因。虽然存在医院感染成本数据,但手部卫生不合规的影响尚不清楚。

目的

估算医护人员在患者护理过程中手部卫生不合规导致耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的相关成本。

设计

创建了两个模型来模拟手部卫生不合规的医护人员连续接触患者的情况。模型 1 涉及接触未知 MRSA 状态的患者,模型 2 涉及接触 MRSA 定植患者,然后接触未知 MRSA 状态的患者。使用已发表的数据计算第二位患者发生新的 MRSA 感染的概率。对 100 万次不合规事件进行模拟。将所有事件的感染总成本进行汇总并摊销。

地点

北卡罗来纳州达勒姆市拥有 750 张床位的三级医疗中心杜克大学医学中心。

结果

模型 1 导致 42 例 MRSA 感染(感染率为 0.0042%)。平均感染成本为 47092 美元(95%置信区间[CI],26040 美元-68146 美元);每次不合规事件的平均成本为 1.98 美元(95%CI,0.91 美元-3.04 美元)。模型 2 导致 980 例 MRSA 感染(0.098%)。平均感染成本为 53598 美元(95%CI,50098 美元-57097 美元);每次不合规事件的平均成本为 52.53 美元(95%CI,47.73 美元-57.32 美元)。一家 200 张床位的医院因手部卫生不合规导致的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染相关费用,每年支出 1779283 美元。一家 200 张床位的医院,如果手部卫生依从性提高 1%,每年可节省 39650 美元。

结论

手部卫生不合规与显著的可归因医院成本相关。合规性的微小提高即可带来大量节省。

相似文献

1
Hand hygiene noncompliance and the cost of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.手卫生不合规与医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的成本。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):357-64. doi: 10.1086/651096.
2
Compliance of hospital staff with guidelines for the active surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its impact on rates of nosocomial MRSA bacteremia.医院工作人员对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)主动监测指南的依从性及其对医院获得性MRSA菌血症发生率的影响。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2011 Dec;13(12):740-4.
3
Active surveillance culturing impacts methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in a pediatric intensive care unit.主动监测培养对小儿重症监护病房耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌获得的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;12(4):e171-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181f39222.
4
A lean Six Sigma team increases hand hygiene compliance and reduces hospital-acquired MRSA infections by 51%.一个精益六西格玛团队提高了手部卫生依从性,并将医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染减少了51%。
J Healthc Qual. 2010 Jul-Aug;32(4):61-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2009.00074.x.
5
Two time-series analyses of the impact of antibiotic consumption and alcohol-based hand disinfection on the incidences of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and Clostridium difficile infection.两项关于抗生素使用和酒精基手部消毒对医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染和艰难梭菌感染发生率影响的时间序列分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;30(4):346-53. doi: 10.1086/596605.
6
Are there differences in hospital cost between patients with nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection and those with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bloodstream infection?耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌医院血流感染患者与甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染患者之间的住院费用有差异吗?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 May;30(5):453-60. doi: 10.1086/596731.
7
Trend of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia in an institution with a high rate of MRSA after the reinforcement of antibiotic stewardship and hand hygiene.强化抗生素管理和手部卫生后,高耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)率机构中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌血症的趋势。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 May;41(5):e39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
8
The economic impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌在加拿大医院造成的经济影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Feb;22(2):99-104. doi: 10.1086/501871.
9
An investigation of contact transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌接触传播的调查
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Oct;58(2):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.06.010.
10
Burden of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections at a Swiss University hospital: excess length of stay and costs.瑞士大学医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染负担:住院时间延长和费用增加。
J Hosp Infect. 2013 Jun;84(2):132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Safety in Anesthesia: Hand Hygiene and Perioperative Infection Control.麻醉中的患者安全:手部卫生与围手术期感染控制。
Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2022;12(4):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s40140-022-00545-x. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
2
Stethoscope hygiene: A legal consideration for cardiologists practicing in a new era of infection control (COVID-19).听诊器卫生:在感染控制新时代(新冠疫情)执业的心内科医生的法律考量
Am Heart J Plus. 2021 Jul;7:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100039. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
3
Hand-hygiene-related clinical trials reported between 2014 and 2020: a comprehensive systematic review.
2014 年至 2020 年间报告的与手部卫生相关的临床试验:一项全面的系统评价。
J Hosp Infect. 2021 May;111:6-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Evaluation of hand hygiene compliance over the years, in an intensive care unit of a north Delhi hospital preparing for accreditation: A 3-year study.对德里北部一家正在准备认证的医院重症监护病房多年来手卫生依从性的评估:一项为期3年的研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Apr 30;9(4):1939-1943. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1050_19. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
[SBA 2020: Regional anesthesia safety recommendations update].[2020年英国麻醉医师协会:区域麻醉安全建议更新]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul-Aug;70(4):398-418. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
Studies of antimicrobial resistance in rare mycobacteria from a nosocomial environment.从医院环境中罕见分枝杆菌的抗菌药物耐药性研究。
BMC Microbiol. 2019 Mar 19;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1428-4.
7
Surveillance cues do not enhance altruistic behavior among anonymous strangers in the field.在现场的匿名陌生人中,监控线索并不能增强利他行为。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 16;13(8):e0197959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197959. eCollection 2018.
8
Understanding hand hygiene behavior in a pediatric oncology unit in a low- to mid-income country.了解中低收入国家一家儿科肿瘤病房的手部卫生行为。
J Nurs Educ Pract. 2016;6(9):1-9. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v6n9p1. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Molecular Epidemiology Survey of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-positive Isolated from Sanandaj, Iran.从伊朗萨南达杰分离出的杀白细胞素阳性菌株的分子流行病学调查
Adv Biomed Res. 2017 Jul 25;6:87. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_243_15. eCollection 2017.
10
Physician report cards and rankings yield long-lasting hand hygiene compliance exceeding 90%.医生报告卡和排名能产生持久的手部卫生合规率,超过90%。
Crit Care. 2015 Aug 14;19(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1008-4.