Fayet B, Racy E, Renard G
Department of Ophthalmology, Hôtel-Dieu de Paris, University of Paris VI Medical School, Paris, France.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2010 Mar;33(3):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2010.01.013. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
To study the behavior of a "pushed" monocanalicular stent by means of nasal endoscopy.
Four children (six affected sides) with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction were treated with monocanalicular intubation with an anchoring plug. The children's mean age at the time of the operation was 33 months (range, 30-37 months). The procedure began with probing in order to verify (a) dacryostenosis (simple or extensive nasolacrimal duct impatency) and (b) the metal-to-metal contact in the lower nasal meatus. The stent was similar to a Monoka(TM), but the guide (a malleable stainless steel probe) is located inside the silicone stent rather than projecting from it. The silicone's total length is 40 mm and the external diameter 0.96 mm. Simultaneously, the guide acts to catheterize the nasolacrimal duct by pushing the silicone through the upper and lower parts of the outflow system. The guide is removed via a punctal approach. This mode of intubation dispenses with the nasal recovery step. Nasal endoscopy was used to monitor (a) the position of the stent in the lower nasal meatus (free or submucosal), (b) mucosal damage and bleeding, and (c) the behavior of the silicone tube during removal of the guide.
Because of the complexity of nasolacrimal ducts, two of the six sides were treated with the classical Monoka intubation method of pulling the silicone tubing out from the nasal exit of the duct (the pull technique). The pushed intubation method was used for the four simple nasolacrimal stenoses, with no problems whatsoever. In all four cases, endoscopic examination showed (a) no submucosal tunneling (false passage), (b) no noteworthy mucosal damage, and (c) no retraction (bunch-up) of the silicone tube during the metal guide removal. No particular complications were reported during the procedure or the intubation period, which lasted an average of 3 weeks. The stents were removed in the consulting room. Tearing ceased during the 1(st) week in two cases, during the intubation period. Tearing persisted throughout the intubation period in the other two cases, but ceased during the week following stent removal. The follow-up lasted 2 months.
The pushed procedure simplifies monocanalicular nasal intubation. Its indications remain to be determined.
通过鼻内镜研究“推送式”单泪小管支架的行为。
4例先天性鼻泪管阻塞患儿(6侧患侧)接受了带锚定塞的单泪小管插管治疗。手术时患儿的平均年龄为33个月(范围30 - 37个月)。手术首先进行探查,以确认(a)泪道狭窄(单纯或广泛鼻泪管不通畅)和(b)下鼻道内金属与金属的接触情况。该支架类似于Monoka™,但引导器(可弯曲不锈钢探针)位于硅胶支架内部而非从其伸出。硅胶管全长40 mm,外径0.96 mm。同时,引导器通过推动硅胶管穿过流出系统的上部和下部来对鼻泪管进行插管。引导器通过泪点途径取出。这种插管方式无需鼻腔恢复步骤。使用鼻内镜监测(a)支架在下鼻道的位置(游离或黏膜下)、(b)黏膜损伤和出血情况以及(c)在取出引导器时硅胶管的行为。
由于鼻泪管的复杂性,6侧中的2侧采用了从鼻泪管鼻端拉出硅胶管的经典Monoka插管方法(牵拉技术)。推送式插管方法用于4例单纯鼻泪管狭窄,未出现任何问题。在所有4例中,内镜检查显示(a)无黏膜下隧道形成(假道)、(b)无明显黏膜损伤以及(c)在取出金属引导器时硅胶管无回缩(聚集)。在平均持续3周的手术或插管期间未报告特殊并发症。支架在诊室取出。2例在插管期间第1周流泪停止。另外2例在整个插管期间流泪持续,但在支架取出后的1周内停止。随访持续2个月。
推送式操作简化了单泪小管鼻腔插管。其适应证仍有待确定。