Suppr超能文献

随机试验模型预测控制改善贫血管理。

Randomized trial of model predictive control for improved anemia management.

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 May;5(5):814-20. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07181009. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Variable hemoglobin (Hb) response to erythropoiesis stimulating agents may result in adverse outcomes. The utility of model predictive control for drug dosing was previously demonstrated.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial to test model predictive control for dosing erythropoietin in ESRD patients. The trial included 60 hemodialysis patients who were randomized into a treatment arm (30 subjects) that received erythropoietin doses on the basis of the computer recommendations or a control arm (30 subjects) that received erythropoietin doses on the basis of recommendations from a standard anemia management protocol (control). The subjects were followed for 8 months, and the proportions of measured Hb within the target of 11 to 12 g/dl and outside 9 to 13 g/dl were measured. Variability of the Hb level was measured by the absolute difference between the achieved Hb and the target Hb of 11.5 g/dl as well as the area under the Hb curve.

RESULTS

Model predictive control resulted in 15 observations >13 or <9 g/dl (outliers), a mean absolute difference between achieved Hb and 11.5 g/dl of 0.98 +/- 0.08 g/dl, and an area under the Hb curve of 2.86 +/- 1.46. The control group algorithm resulted in 30 Hb outliers (P = 0.051), produced a mean absolute difference between achieved Hb and 11.5 g/dl of 1.18 +/- 0.18 g/dl (P < 0.001 difference in variance), and an area under the Hb curve of 3.38 +/- 2.69 (P = 0.025 difference in variance).

CONCLUSIONS

Model predictive control of erythropoietin administration improves anemia management.

摘要

背景和目的

红细胞生成刺激剂(ESA)治疗导致的血红蛋白(Hb)反应变异性可能导致不良结局。此前已证明模型预测控制在药物剂量调整方面的效用。

设计、设置、参与者和测量:这是一项双盲、随机、对照试验,旨在测试模型预测控制在 ESRD 患者中ESA 剂量调整中的应用。该试验纳入了 60 名血液透析患者,随机分为治疗组(30 名患者)和对照组(30 名患者)。治疗组根据计算机建议给予ESA 剂量,对照组根据标准贫血管理方案(对照组)的建议给予ESA 剂量。对受试者进行了 8 个月的随访,测量了测量 Hb 值在 11 至 12g/dl 目标范围内和 9 至 13g/dl 目标范围外的比例。Hb 水平的变异性通过实现的 Hb 与 11.5g/dl 目标 Hb 的绝对差值以及 Hb 曲线下面积来衡量。

结果

模型预测控制导致 15 次 Hb 值>13 或<9g/dl(异常值),实现的 Hb 与 11.5g/dl 之间的平均绝对差值为 0.98 +/- 0.08g/dl,Hb 曲线下面积为 2.86 +/- 1.46。对照组算法导致 30 次 Hb 值异常(P=0.051),实现的 Hb 与 11.5g/dl 之间的平均绝对差值为 1.18 +/- 0.18g/dl(P<0.001,方差差异),Hb 曲线下面积为 3.38 +/- 2.69(P=0.025,方差差异)。

结论

ESA 给药的模型预测控制可改善贫血管理。

相似文献

1
Randomized trial of model predictive control for improved anemia management.随机试验模型预测控制改善贫血管理。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 May;5(5):814-20. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07181009. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Evaluation of glucose controllers in virtual environment: methodology and sample application.
Artif Intell Med. 2004 Nov;32(3):171-81. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.02.006.
10
Role of type of vascular access in erythropoietin and intravenous iron requirements in haemodialysis.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001 Nov;16(11):2188-93. doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.11.2188.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验