Suh Won S, Lee Chae Kyung
Department of Healthcare Management, Kyungwon University, Korea.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2010 Jan;43(1):26-34. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.1.26.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the impact of shared-decision making on patient satisfaction. The study is significant since it focuses on developing appropriate methodologies and analyzing data to identify patient preferences, with the goals of optimizing treatment selection, and substantiating the relationship between such preferences and their impact on outcomes.
A thorough literature review that developed the framework illustrating key dimensions of shared decision making was followed by a quantitative assessment and regression analysis of patient-perceived satisfaction, and the degree of shared-decision making.
A positive association was evident between shared-decision making and patient satisfaction. The impact of shared decision making on patient satisfaction was greater than other variable including gender, education, and number of visits.
Patients who participate in care-related decisions and who are given an explanation of their health problems are more likely to be satisfied with their care. It would benefit health care organizations to train their medical professionals in this communication method, and to include it in their practice guidelines.
本研究旨在分析共同决策对患者满意度的影响。该研究具有重要意义,因为它专注于开发合适的方法并分析数据以确定患者偏好,目标是优化治疗选择,并证实此类偏好与其对治疗结果的影响之间的关系。
在进行全面的文献综述以构建说明共同决策关键维度的框架之后,对患者感知的满意度和共同决策程度进行了定量评估及回归分析。
共同决策与患者满意度之间存在明显的正相关关系。共同决策对患者满意度的影响大于包括性别、教育程度和就诊次数在内的其他变量。
参与与护理相关决策并得到健康问题解释的患者对护理更有可能感到满意。医疗保健组织若对其医疗专业人员进行这种沟通方式的培训,并将其纳入实践指南,将从中受益。