• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱支架在批准和超适应证使用方面的时间趋势:一项大型多中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究的纵向分析。

Temporal trends in the use of drug-eluting stents for approved and off-label indications: a longitudinal analysis of a large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention registry.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2010 Feb;33(2):111-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.20717.

DOI:10.1002/clc.20717
PMID:20186993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6653428/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to examine the temporal variations in the rate of both bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) use for off-label indications after the reports of an increased risk of very late stent thrombosis in patients with DES at the 2006 meeting of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

HYPOTHESIS

To determine whether the decrease in use of DES has affected both on and off-label indications.

METHODS

The study cohort included patients undergoing coronary intervention in a large regional registry, the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2). Patient demographic and clinical characteristics for patients with DES in the third quarter of 2006 (pre-ESC) were compared to those from the fourth quarter of 2008 (post-guideline changes). Use of DES for off-label indications, such as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), in-stent restenosis (ISR), and saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall deployment of DES fell sharply from 83% pre-ESC to a plateau of 58% in the first quarter of 2008. This corresponded to a rise in BMS use, while angioplasty procedures stayed the same. The STEMI subgroup showed the most dramatic change, from 78% to only 36%. Off-label use in SVGs showed a similar trend, from 74% to 43%. Drug-eluting stent deployment for ISR was less affected, though it also fell 25% (from 79%-56%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DES has fallen dramatically from June 2006 to December 2008, particularly for nonapproved indications. Our study provides a real-world assessment of contemporary change in DES use in response to the presentation of negative observational studies.

摘要

背景

我们试图研究在 2006 年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)会议上报告了药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗患者的极晚期支架血栓形成风险增加后,未经批准适应证的裸金属支架(BMS)和药物洗脱支架(DES)使用率的时间变化。

假设

确定 DES 使用量的减少是否影响了适应证和超适应证。

方法

研究队列包括在大型区域注册中心——蓝十字蓝盾密歇根心血管联盟(BMC2)接受冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。将 2006 年第三季度(ESC 前)接受 DES 治疗的患者的患者人口统计学和临床特征与 2008 年第四季度(指南变化后)的患者进行比较。评估 DES 用于超适应证,如 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、支架内再狭窄(ISR)和大隐静脉桥(SVG)介入治疗的情况。

结果

ESC 前,DES 的总体使用率从 83%急剧下降到 2008 年第一季度的 58%。这与 BMS 使用量的增加相对应,而血管成形术保持不变。STEMI 亚组的变化最为显著,从 78%降至 36%。SVG 的超适应证使用也呈现出类似的趋势,从 74%降至 43%。ISR 的 DES 使用率受影响较小,尽管也下降了 25%(从 79%降至 56%)。

结论

自 2006 年 6 月至 2008 年 12 月,DES 的使用率大幅下降,特别是对于未经批准的适应证。我们的研究提供了对 DES 使用变化的真实世界评估,以应对负面观察性研究的发表。

相似文献

1
Temporal trends in the use of drug-eluting stents for approved and off-label indications: a longitudinal analysis of a large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention registry.药物洗脱支架在批准和超适应证使用方面的时间趋势:一项大型多中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究的纵向分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2010 Feb;33(2):111-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.20717.
2
Outcomes and complications with off-label use of drug-eluting stents: results from the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) group.药物洗脱支架非标签使用的结局和并发症:STENT(新疗法的战略导管评估)组的结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):405-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.06.005.
3
Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的对比
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr;1(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.01.006.
4
Stent thrombosis in new-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: a report from SCAAR.新一代药物洗脱支架在 STEMI 患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的支架血栓形成:来自 SCAAR 的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 8;64(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.022.
5
HIV status and type of coronary stent placed in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的HIV感染状况及所植入冠状动脉支架的类型
Coron Artery Dis. 2017 May;28(3):239-245. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000488.
6
Outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention results from the STENT (strategic transcatheter evaluation of new therapies) group.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在静脉桥血管介入治疗中的结果来自 STENT(新疗法的策略性经导管评估)研究组。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.020.
7
Outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies (STENT) Group.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的疗效比较:新型治疗策略经导管评估(STENT)组的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):893-900. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21767.
8
Comparison of newer-generation drug-eluting with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of the EXAMINATION (clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V stent in Acute Myocardial INfArcTION) and COMFORTABLE-AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trials.比较新一代药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:EXAMINATION(急性心肌梗死中评价 Xience-V 支架的临床研究)和 COMFORTABLE-AMI(急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中生物可降解涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较研究)试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
In-hospital and 1-year outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention: a report from the EVENT registry.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在静脉桥血管介入治疗中的院内和 1 年预后:来自 EVENT 注册研究的报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec 1;80(7):1127-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24352. Epub 2012 May 4.
10
Risk of stent thrombosis among bare-metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents, and second-generation drug-eluting stents: results from a registry of 18,334 patients.裸金属支架、第一代药物洗脱支架和第二代药物洗脱支架的支架血栓形成风险:来自 18334 名患者的注册研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry with a Data Management Approach: A Systematic Review.采用数据管理方法建立导管插入术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗登记系统:一项系统评价
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2019 Jan 1;16(Winter):1b. eCollection 2019 Winter.
2
Penetration rate of the placement of a drug-eluting stent for the treatment of superficial femoral artery lesions in Japan.日本药物洗脱支架用于治疗股浅动脉病变的植入渗透率。
Heart Vessels. 2017 Sep;32(9):1093-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-0982-7. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent for treatment of saphenous vein grafts: a meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架治疗静脉桥:荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 10;5(6):e11040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011040.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal changes in the use of drug-eluting stents for patients with non-ST-Segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from 2006 to 2008: results from the can rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients supress ADverse outcomes with early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines (CRUSADE) and acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network-get with the guidelines (ACTION-GWTG) registries.2006年至2008年接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者使用药物洗脱支架的时间变化:来自“能否通过早期实施美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)指南快速对不稳定型心绞痛患者进行危险分层以抑制不良结局(CRUSADE)”及“急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结局网络-遵循指南(ACTION-GWTG)”注册研究的结果
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Sep;2(5):414-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.850248. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
2
Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死中紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1946-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810116.
3
Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in Sweden.瑞典药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的长期安全性和有效性
N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1933-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809902.
4
Unrestricted use of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in routine clinical practice: findings from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry.在常规临床实践中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的 unrestricted 使用:来自美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究的结果。(注:这里“unrestricted”翻译为“无限制的”,但感觉表述不太准确,可能原文有特定含义,需结合更多背景理解)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 20;50(21):2029-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.071.
5
Effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents in Ontario.安大略省药物洗脱支架的有效性和安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 4;357(14):1393-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071076.
6
Meta-analysis of randomized trials of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架随机试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;99(10):1399-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.069. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
7
Stent thrombosis redux--the FDA perspective.支架内血栓复发——美国食品药品监督管理局的观点
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):984-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068304. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
8
Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden.瑞典药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的长期疗效对比
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1009-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067722. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
9
Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians.冠状动脉支架置入患者双联抗血小板治疗过早停药的预防:美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会、心血管造影和介入学会、美国外科医师学会及美国牙科协会的科学咨询意见,美国医师学会也参与其中
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Feb 13;49(6):734-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.003.
10
Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents.停用氯吡格雷后的晚期临床事件可能会限制药物洗脱支架的益处:一项药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的观察性研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2584-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.026. Epub 2006 Nov 2.