Dept. of Food Engineering, Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore 570 020, India.
Biotechnol Prog. 2010 May-Jun;26(3):763-71. doi: 10.1002/btpr.383.
The extraction of lactoperoxidase (EC 1.11.1.7) from whey was studied using single step reverse micelles-assisted extraction and compared with reverse micellar extraction. The reverse micelles-assisted extraction resulted in extraction of contaminating proteins and recovery of lactoperoxidase in the aqueous phase leading to its purification. Reverse micellar extraction at the optimized condition after forward and backward steps resulted in activity recovery of lactoperoxidase and purification factor of the order of 86.60% and 3.25-fold, respectively. Whereas reverse micelles-assisted extraction resulted in higher activity recovery of lactoperoxidase (127.35%) and purification factor (3.39-fold). The sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) profiles also evidenced that higher purification was obtained in reverse micelles-assisted extraction as compared of reverse micellar extracted lactoperoxidase.
从乳清中提取乳过氧化物酶(EC 1.11.1.7),采用一步法反胶束辅助提取,并与反胶束提取进行比较。反胶束辅助提取导致了污染蛋白的提取和乳过氧化物酶在水相中的回收,从而实现了其纯化。在前向和后向步骤优化条件下进行反胶束提取后,乳过氧化物酶的活性回收率和纯化因子分别达到了 86.60%和 3.25 倍。而反胶束辅助提取则导致乳过氧化物酶的活性回收率(127.35%)和纯化因子(3.39 倍)更高。十二烷基硫酸钠聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)图谱也表明,与反胶束提取的乳过氧化物酶相比,反胶束辅助提取获得了更高的纯化度。