Suppr超能文献

基于 T1 加权动态对比增强 MRI 的示踪剂动力学模型比较:在宫颈癌中的应用。

A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix.

机构信息

Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2010 Mar;63(3):691-700. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22217.

Abstract

The Tofts tracer kinetic models are often used to analyze dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data. They are derived from a general two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) but assume negligible plasma mean transit time. The 2CXM estimates tissue plasma perfusion and capillary permeability-surface area; the Tofts models estimate the transfer constant K(trans), which reflects a combination of these two parameters. The aims of this study were to compare the 2CXM and Tofts models and report microvascular parameters in patients with cervical cancer. Thirty patients were scanned pretreatment using a dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI protocol with a 3 sec temporal resolution and a total scan duration of 4 min. Whole-tumor parameters were estimated with both models. The 2CXM provided superior fits to the data for all patients (all 30 P values < 0.005), and significantly different parameter estimates were obtained (P < 0.01). K(trans) (mean = 0.35 +/- 0.26 min(-1)) did not equal absolute values of tissue plasma perfusion (mean = 0.65 +/- 0.56 mL/mL/min) or permeability-surface area (mean = 0.14 +/- 0.09 mL/mL/min) but correlated strongly with tissue plasma perfusion (r = 0.944; P = 0.01). Average plasma mean transit time, calculated with the 2CXM, was 22 +/- 16 sec, suggesting the assumption of negligible plasma mean transit time is not appropriate in this dataset and the 2CXM is better suited for its analysis than the Tofts models. The results demonstrate the importance of selecting an appropriate tracer kinetic model in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

摘要

Tofts 示踪剂动力学模型常用于分析动态对比增强磁共振成像 (DCE-MRI) 数据。这些模型是从一般的双室交换模型 (2CXM) 推导出来的,但假定血浆平均通过时间可以忽略不计。2CXM 可以估计组织血浆灌注和毛细血管通透性表面积;而 Tofts 模型则可以估计转移常数 K(trans),它反映了这两个参数的组合。本研究旨在比较 2CXM 和 Tofts 模型,并报告宫颈癌患者的微血管参数。30 例患者在治疗前使用动态对比增强 MRI 方案进行扫描,时间分辨率为 3 秒,总扫描时间为 4 分钟。两种模型均对全肿瘤参数进行了估计。对于所有患者,2CXM 对数据的拟合都更好(所有 30 个 P 值 < 0.005),并且得到了显著不同的参数估计值(P < 0.01)。K(trans)(平均值= 0.35 +/- 0.26 min(-1)))与组织血浆灌注(平均值= 0.65 +/- 0.56 mL/mL/min)或通透性表面积(平均值= 0.14 +/- 0.09 mL/mL/min)的绝对值不相等,但与组织血浆灌注密切相关(r = 0.944;P = 0.01)。用 2CXM 计算的平均血浆平均通过时间为 22 +/- 16 秒,表明在该数据集中小动脉平均通过时间可以忽略不计的假设是不合适的,2CXM 比 Tofts 模型更适合其分析。这些结果表明在 DCE-MRI 中选择适当的示踪剂动力学模型的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验