Green Joseph P, Green Emily S
Department of Psychology, 4240 Campus Drive, The Ohio State University, Lima, OH 45804, USA.
Am J Clin Hypn. 2010 Jan;52(3):205-18. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2010.10401720.
Using a sample of nearly 300 undergraduate students, we examined whether absorption, dissociation, and hypnotizability were linked with pet attachment, and whether completing assessment scales in the same or different testing contexts affected the association. We found a positive correlation between scores on the Tellegen Absorption Scale (TAS; Tellegen & Atkinson, 1974) and the Companion Animal Bonding Scale (CABS; Poresky, Hendrix, & Mosier, 1987), but failed to find a positive link between animal attachment and scores on the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES; Bernstein & Putnam, 1986). We observed a small positive correlation between Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A; Shor & Orne, 1962) scores and animal attachment among our female participants. Collectively, absorption, dissociation, hypnotizability, age, gender, years owning a pet, and the testing context accounted for no more than 16% of the variance in CABS scores.
我们以近300名本科生为样本,研究了专注性、解离性和催眠易感性是否与宠物依恋有关,以及在相同或不同测试环境下完成评估量表是否会影响这种关联。我们发现,泰勒根专注性量表(TAS;泰勒根和阿特金森,1974年)得分与伴侣动物亲密关系量表(CABS;波雷斯基、亨德里克斯和莫西尔,1987年)得分之间存在正相关,但未发现动物依恋与解离体验量表(DES;伯恩斯坦和普特南,1986年)得分之间存在正相关。我们观察到,在我们的女性参与者中,哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A版(HGSHS:A;肖尔和奥恩,1962年)得分与动物依恋之间存在微弱的正相关。总体而言,专注性、解离性、催眠易感性、年龄、性别、拥有宠物的年限以及测试环境在CABS得分的方差中所占比例不超过16%。