Green J P
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Lima 45804, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1997 Jan;45(1):69-80. doi: 10.1080/00207149708416107.
The present study examined whether participants (N = 112) selected on the basis of high and low dissociative ability (Dissociative Experiences Scale [DES]; Bernstein & Putnam, 1986), high and low/simulating hypnotizability (Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A [HGSHS:A]; Shor & Orne, 1962), and past performance on the HGSHS:A amnesia item differentially passed an automatic writing suggestion administered during a follow-up experiment. Results from a loglinear analysis supported a single main effect for hypnotizability. Low hypnotizable, simulating participants were more than six times as likely to pass the automatic writing suggestion than high hypnotizable participants. Results found dissociation status and past performance on an ostensibly dissociative suggestion (i.e., amnesia) to be independent of passing the automatic writing suggestion. Findings are discussed in light of other research regarding the relation between the DES and hypnotizability.
本研究考察了根据分离能力高低(分离体验量表[DES];伯恩斯坦和普特南,1986年)、催眠易感性高低/模拟催眠易感性(哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A式[HGSHS:A];肖尔和奥恩,1962年)以及在HGSHS:A失忆项目上的过往表现选取的参与者(N = 112),在后续实验中是否会以不同方式通过一项自动书写暗示。对数线性分析结果支持了催眠易感性的单一主效应。低催眠易感性、模拟参与者通过自动书写暗示的可能性是高催眠易感性参与者的六倍多。结果发现,分离状态以及在一项表面上具有分离性的暗示(即失忆)上的过往表现与通过自动书写暗示无关。结合其他关于DES与催眠易感性之间关系的研究对研究结果进行了讨论。