Marsella Rosanna, Saridomichelakis Manolis N
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0126, USA.
Vet Dermatol. 2010 Feb;21(1):105-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00859.x.
This study aimed to investigate whether challenge with storage mites elicited flare ups of atopic dermatitis (AD) in Dermatophagoides farinae sensitized atopic Beagles housed in a house dust and storage mite-free environment. Atopic Beagles were environmentally challenged with 50 mg of Tyrophagus putrescentiae for three days in a row. Clinical signs were scored before, 6 h after each challenge and then every 24 h for a total of 5 days using a Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index. Four healthy Beagles, negative on serology and intradermal testing for both house dust and storage mites, were used as controls and similarly challenged. A month after environmental challenge, the atopic Beagles were challenged by the oral route (50 mg of T. putrescentiae for three days in a row) and evaluated as described. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used for comparisons between groups and types of challenges. All atopic Beagles developed erythematous pruritic lesions clinically compatible with AD on the face, pinnae, feet and ventral abdomen after both environmental and oral challenge. Control dogs did not develop dermatitis except for mild pinnal erythema in one dog. In the environmental challenge, ANOVA showed a significant effect of time, group, and group x time interaction, with atopic Beagles showing significantly higher scores than the controls. There were no significant differences in clinical scores after oral and environmental challenge in the atopic group. Cross-reactivity between house dust and storage mites could therefore contribute to flare ups of AD in house dust mite allergic dogs.
本研究旨在调查在饲养于无屋尘螨和仓储螨环境中的对粉尘螨致敏的特应性比格犬中,用仓储螨激发是否会引发特应性皮炎(AD)发作。特应性比格犬连续三天接受50毫克腐食酪螨的环境激发。在每次激发前、激发后6小时以及之后每24小时对临床症状进行评分,共持续5天,使用犬特应性皮炎范围和严重程度指数。选取4只血清学和皮内试验对屋尘螨和仓储螨均呈阴性的健康比格犬作为对照,进行类似激发。环境激发一个月后,对特应性比格犬进行口服激发(连续三天给予50毫克腐食酪螨),并按上述方法进行评估。采用方差分析(ANOVA)对组间和激发类型进行比较。在环境激发和口服激发后,所有特应性比格犬在面部、耳廓、足部和腹侧腹部均出现了临床上与AD相符的红斑性瘙痒性病变。对照犬除一只出现轻度耳廓红斑外,未发生皮炎。在环境激发中,方差分析显示时间、组间以及组间×时间交互作用有显著影响,特应性比格犬的评分显著高于对照组。特应性组在口服激发和环境激发后的临床评分无显著差异。因此,屋尘螨和仓储螨之间的交叉反应可能导致屋尘螨过敏犬的AD发作。