Forensic Science Programme, Department of Chemistry, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Talanta. 2010 Apr 15;81(1-2):455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.12.025. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
Evaluation of the risk posed by contaminants present during and after decontamination of clandestine methamphetamine laboratories requires a connection between the levels of contaminants measured and those actually present at the scene. The recoveries of pseudoephedrine and methamphetamine from glass, stainless steel, and a range of impermeable surfaces likely to be found in a clandestine laboratory were examined, using GC-MS of derivatized samples as the analytical method. When surfaces had been cleaned prior to drug deposition, wiping with water-dampened filter paper can recover 60-80% of pseudoephedrine immediately after deposition, and at least 50% of the pseudoephedrine still present on a surface after 2 days when deposited at a surface concentration of 2.5 microg/100 cm(2). Wiping with methanol-dampened filter paper could recover 60-90% of the methamphetamine immediately after deposition, and could recover at least 50-60% of the methamphetamine still present after 2 days when 0.6 microg/100 cm(2) was initially deposited on the surface. Recoveries were lower for surfaces that had not been pre-cleaned. Methamphetamine and pseudoephedrine showed significant volatility in both the free base and hydrochloride forms, with experiments in an enclosed format showing up to half the recovered drug being present on a glass plate held about 4mm above a substrate contaminated with one of the drugs at the above surface concentrations after 2 days. It is therefore important to remove any visible bulk contaminants and remove obvious pseudoephedrine or methamphetamine-contaminated surfaces prior to heating, ventilation or sealing of a clandestine laboratory to avoid redistribution of material around the site. A revised method for pseudoephedrine analysis was developed that could also detect the pseudoephedrine-formaldehyde adduct that can form from trace pseudoephedrine present at clandestine laboratories.
评估在非法制造冰毒实验室的清理过程中和清理后存在的污染物所带来的风险,需要将测量的污染物水平与现场实际存在的污染物水平联系起来。本研究采用衍生化样品的 GC-MS 分析方法,考察了玻璃、不锈钢和一系列在非法制造冰毒实验室中可能发现的不可渗透表面上假麻黄碱和甲基苯丙胺的回收率。在药物沉积前对表面进行清洗时,用湿润的滤纸擦拭可在药物沉积后立即回收 60-80%的假麻黄碱,而当以 2.5 微克/100cm2 的表面浓度沉积在表面上 2 天后,仍有至少 50%的假麻黄碱存在。用甲醇湿润的滤纸擦拭可在药物沉积后立即回收 60-90%的甲基苯丙胺,而当以 0.6 微克/100cm2 的初始浓度沉积在表面上时,在 2 天后仍有至少 50-60%的甲基苯丙胺存在。对于未预先清洁的表面,回收率较低。游离碱和盐酸盐形式的甲基苯丙胺和假麻黄碱都具有显著的挥发性,在封闭格式的实验中,在 2 天后,在一个盛有药物的玻璃盘上,距离被污染的基底约 4mm 处,有高达一半的回收药物存在,该基底被上述表面浓度之一污染。因此,在加热、通风或密封非法制造冰毒实验室之前,去除任何可见的大块污染物和清除明显的假麻黄碱或甲基苯丙胺污染表面非常重要,以避免物质在现场周围重新分布。本研究还开发了一种假麻黄碱分析的改良方法,该方法还可以检测到在非法制造冰毒实验室中痕量假麻黄碱形成的假麻黄碱-甲醛加合物。