Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010 Jul;73(5):961-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.02.014. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
Ecotoxicological risk assessments of contaminated soil are commonly completed using guideline values based on total concentrations. However, only certain fractions of contaminants are bioavailable and pose a hazard to the environment. This paper investigates the relationship between measured metal concentrations in soil and soil leachate, and the effects in organisms exposed to intact, undisturbed soil cores (wheat, Tricum aestivum) and soil leachate (lettuce, Lactuca sativa, and water flea, Daphnia magna). Despite the samples containing metal concentrations significantly above guideline values, metals of concern (e.g. Pb and Zn) did not have a significant toxic effect on wheat or D. magna. During weeks with low leachate pH, an effect on lettuce root elongation was observed in the most contaminated samples. This study has shown that bioassays with intact soil cores can indicate metal bioavailability and provide a better estimate of ecological risk than total metal concentrations in the soil.
污染土壤的生态毒理学风险评估通常使用基于总浓度的指导值来完成。然而,只有污染物的某些部分具有生物可利用性,并对环境构成危害。本文研究了土壤中测定的金属浓度与土壤浸出液之间的关系,以及暴露于完整、未受干扰的土壤芯(小麦,Triticum aestivum)和土壤浸出液(生菜,Lactuca sativa 和水蚤,Daphnia magna)中的生物体的影响。尽管样本中的金属浓度明显高于指导值,但关注的金属(例如 Pb 和 Zn)对小麦或 D. magna 没有显著的毒性作用。在浸出液 pH 值较低的几周内,最受污染的样本中观察到生菜根伸长受到影响。本研究表明,使用完整土壤芯的生物测定可以指示金属的生物可利用性,并比土壤中的总金属浓度更好地估计生态风险。