Yanagawa T, Shinozaki T, Iizuka Y, Takagishi K, Watanabe H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University School of Health Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Mar;92(3):419-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23131.
We retrospectively reviewed 71 histopathologically-confirmed bone and soft-tissue metastases of unknown origin at presentation. In order to identify the site of the primary tumour all 71 cases were examined with conventional procedures, including CT, serum tumour markers, a plain radiograph, ultrasound examination and endoscopic examinations, and 24 of the 71 cases underwent 2-deoxy-2-[F-18] fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). This detected multiple bone metastases in nine patients and the primary site in 12 of the 24 cases; conventional studies revealed 16 primary tumours. There was no significant difference in sensitivity between FDG-PET and conventional studies. The mean maximal standardised uptake value of the metastatic tumours was significantly higher than that of the primary tumours, which is likely to explain why FDG-PET did not provide better results. It was not superior to conventional procedures in the search for the primary site of bone and soft-tissue metastases; however, it seemed to be useful in the staging of malignancy.
我们回顾性分析了71例组织病理学确诊的初诊时原发灶不明的骨与软组织转移瘤。为确定原发肿瘤部位,对所有71例患者均采用了包括CT、血清肿瘤标志物、X线平片、超声检查及内镜检查在内的传统检查方法,71例患者中有24例接受了2-脱氧-2-[F-18]氟代-D-葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像(FDG-PET)检查。FDG-PET检查发现9例患者存在多发骨转移,24例中有12例明确了原发部位;传统检查发现了16个原发肿瘤。FDG-PET与传统检查在敏感性方面无显著差异。转移瘤的平均最大标准化摄取值显著高于原发肿瘤,这可能是FDG-PET未取得更好结果的原因。在寻找骨与软组织转移瘤的原发部位方面,FDG-PET并不优于传统检查方法;然而,它在恶性肿瘤分期方面似乎是有用的。