• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用潜伏期到问题行为来评估在功能分析中纳入的需求。

Use of latency to problem behavior to evaluate demands for inclusion in functional analyses.

机构信息

Marcus Autism Center, 1920 Briarcliff Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):723-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-723.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-723
PMID:20190935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2741062/
Abstract

Few direct-assessment procedures are designed to identify potential negative reinforcers (e.g., including demands in the escape condition of functional analyses). Two participants were systematically exposed to a series of demands nominated by caregivers as potential negative reinforcers. Sessions ended following the first instance of problem behavior, and a hierarchy of demand aversiveness was created based on the latency to the first problem behavior. Subsequent functional analyses confirmed the predictive value of the hierarchy, with shorter latency demands consistently producing more differentiated functional analysis outcomes.

摘要

几乎没有直接评估程序旨在识别潜在的负强化物(例如,在功能分析的逃避条件中包括要求)。两名参与者被系统地暴露于照顾者提名的一系列潜在负强化物的要求下。在首次出现问题行为后,治疗即结束,并根据首次出现问题行为的潜伏期创建了一个需求厌恶层级。随后的功能分析证实了该层级的预测价值,较短的潜伏期需求始终产生更具区分性的功能分析结果。

相似文献

1
Use of latency to problem behavior to evaluate demands for inclusion in functional analyses.使用潜伏期到问题行为来评估在功能分析中纳入的需求。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):723-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-723.
2
Accuracy of caregiver identification of demands for children with escape-maintained challenging behavior.照顾者识别有逃避维持的挑战性行为的儿童需求的准确性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Dec;119:104083. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104083. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
3
Use of a latency-based demand assessment to identify potential demands for functional analyses.使用基于潜伏期的需求评估来识别功能分析的潜在需求。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Dec;49(4):900-914. doi: 10.1002/jaba.341. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
4
Assessing preferences for positive and negative reinforcement during treatment of destructive behavior with functional communication training.在采用功能性沟通训练治疗破坏性行为期间评估对正强化和负强化的偏好。
Res Dev Disabil. 2005 Mar-Apr;26(2):153-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.01.007.
5
Use of a paired-stimulus demand analysis to evaluate demands for inclusion in functional analyses.使用成对刺激需求分析来评估纳入功能分析的需求。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Apr;53(2):665-677. doi: 10.1002/jaba.651. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Noncontingent reinforcement: Arbitrary versus maintaining reinforcers for escape-maintained problem behavior.非连续性强化:针对逃避维持的问题行为,任意强化物与维持性强化物的比较
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jun;54(3):984-1000. doi: 10.1002/jaba.821. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
Response latency as an index of response strength during functional analyses of problem behavior.在问题行为的功能分析中,反应时作为反应强度的指标。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Spring;44(1):51-67. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-51.
8
Two sides of the same coin: learning via positive and negative reinforcers in the human striatum.同一枚硬币的两面:人类纹状体中的正负强化学习。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;1(4):494-505. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.07.006.
9
Negative reinforcer magnitude manipulations for treating escape-maintained problem behavior.采用负增强物强度调控来处理逃避维持的问题行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1514-1530. doi: 10.1002/jaba.683. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
10
Evaluation of a latency-based competing stimulus assessment.基于潜伏期的竞争性刺激评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024;57(4):947-956. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2900. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A short review on behavioural assessment methods in rodents.啮齿动物行为评估方法的简短综述。
Bioinformation. 2023 Aug 31;19(8):866-870. doi: 10.6026/97320630019866. eCollection 2023.
2
The Use of Demand Assessments: A Brief Review and Practical Guide.需求评估的使用:简要回顾与实用指南
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Feb 22;14(2):410-421. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00542-8. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Toward the Development of a Functional Analysis Risk Assessment Decision Tool.迈向功能分析风险评估决策工具的开发。
Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Jul 20;13(4):978-990. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00433-y. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
A Proposed Model for Selecting Measurement Procedures for the Assessment and Treatment of Problem Behavior.一种用于选择评估和治疗问题行为的测量程序的提议模型。
Behav Anal Pract. 2015 Oct 13;9(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0063-2. eCollection 2016 Mar.
5
Comparisons of synthesized and individual reinforcement contingencies during functional analysis.功能分析期间合成强化偶联与个体强化偶联的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Sep;49(3):596-616. doi: 10.1002/jaba.314. Epub 2016 May 13.
6
REDUCING AMBIGUITY IN THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR.减少问题行为功能评估中的模糊性
Behav Interv. 2015 Feb;30(1):1-35. doi: 10.1002/bin.1400.
7
Conducting Functional Communication Training via Telehealth to Reduce the Problem Behavior of Young Children with Autism.通过远程医疗开展功能性沟通训练以减少自闭症幼儿的问题行为。
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2013 Feb 1;25(1):35-48. doi: 10.1007/s10882-012-9314-0. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
8
Response latency as an index of response strength during functional analyses of problem behavior.在问题行为的功能分析中,反应时作为反应强度的指标。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Spring;44(1):51-67. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-51.

本文引用的文献

1
An evaluation of the types of attention that maintain problem behavior.对维持问题行为的注意力类型的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):167-71. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.43-06.
2
A brief method for conducting a negative-reinforcement assessment.一种进行负强化评估的简要方法。
Res Dev Disabil. 1999 Mar-Apr;20(2):107-24. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(98)00036-5.
3
Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.迈向自我伤害的功能分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197-209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197.
4
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.