Santos Silvia J, Hurtado-Ortiz Maria T, Sneed Carl D
California State University, Dominguez Hills.
Hisp J Behav Sci. 2009 Aug 1;31(3):395-412. doi: 10.1177/0739986309339911.
This study examined the validity of the Klonoff and Landrine (1994) illness-belief scale when applied to Latino college students (n=156; 34% male, 66% female) at high-risk for future diabetes onset. Principal factor analysis yielded four significant factors - emotional, folk-beliefs, punitive, gene/hereditary - which accounted for 64.5% of variance and provided a culturally-relevant Latino perspective of the causes of diabetes. Additional analyses by age, gender, immigrant status and psychological acculturation revealed significant differences by age on the emotional and folk illness factors and a negative correlation between assimilation and endorsement of the emotional factor. The implication of these four illness factors for predicting health-related behaviors and health-outcomes among young Latinos was discussed as were recommendations for future research.
本研究检验了克洛诺夫和兰德林(1994年)疾病信念量表应用于未来患糖尿病风险较高的拉丁裔大学生(n = 156;34%为男性,66%为女性)时的有效性。主因子分析产生了四个显著因子——情感、民间信仰、惩罚性、基因/遗传——它们解释了64.5%的方差,并提供了与文化相关的拉丁裔对糖尿病病因的看法。按年龄、性别、移民身份和心理文化适应进行的进一步分析显示,年龄在情感和民间疾病因子上存在显著差异,同化与情感因子的认同之间存在负相关。讨论了这四个疾病因子对预测年轻拉丁裔健康相关行为和健康结果的意义以及对未来研究的建议。