• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国西南热带季节性雨林中藤本植物与树木的成本效益对比策略。

Contrasting cost-benefit strategy between lianas and trees in a tropical seasonal rain forest in southwestern China.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan, China.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2010 Jul;163(3):591-9. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1579-3. Epub 2010 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00442-010-1579-3
PMID:20191291
Abstract

Lianas are an important component of tropical forests and often abundant in open habitats, such as tree-fall gaps, forest edges, and disturbed forests. The abundance of lianas in tropical forests has been increasing as a result of global environmental change and increasing forest fragmentation. In order to understand this phenomenon in terms of leaf functional traits and to evaluate their competitive potential, we conducted a cost-benefit analysis of leaves from 18 liana species and 19 tree species in a tropical seasonal rain forest. The results revealed that lianas were scattered in a group distinct from trees along the first axis of a principal component analysis using 15 leaf ecophysiological traits, being located at the quick-return end of the leaf economics spectrum, with higher specific leaf area and photosynthetic rates (A), higher photosynthetic nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) use efficiencies, a lower leaf construction cost per unit leaf area (CC) and cost-benefit ratio (CC/A), and a shorter leaf life span (LLS). Trees showed the opposite trends. The results indicate that lianas can grow faster and capture resources more efficiently than trees in disturbed, open habitats. The positive relationship between LLS and CC/A revealed a trade-off between leaf construction cost and benefit over time. The 37 species analyzed had a mean foliar N/P ratio of 20, indicating that the forest was characterized by a P deficit. With an increasing atmospheric CO(2) concentration, the higher nutrient use efficiency could benefit lianas more than trees in terms of productivity, possibly also contributing to the increasing abundance of lianas in nutrient-limited tropical forests.

摘要

藤本植物是热带森林的重要组成部分,通常在开阔生境中丰富,如树木倒伏的空隙、森林边缘和受干扰的森林。由于全球环境变化和森林破碎化的加剧,热带森林中藤本植物的丰度有所增加。为了从叶片功能特征的角度理解这一现象,并评估它们的竞争潜力,我们对热带季节性雨林中 18 种藤本植物和 19 种木本植物的叶片进行了成本效益分析。结果表明,15 种叶片生理生态特征的主成分分析结果显示,藤本植物沿第一轴呈分散状态,与树木形成明显的集群,位于叶片经济谱的快速回报端,具有较高的比叶面积和光合速率(A)、较高的光合氮(N)和磷(P)利用效率、单位叶面积叶片构建成本(CC)和成本效益比(CC/A)较低,叶片寿命(LLS)较短。树木则表现出相反的趋势。结果表明,在受干扰的开阔生境中,藤本植物比树木生长更快,能更有效地获取资源。LLS 与 CC/A 之间的正相关关系揭示了叶片构建成本和效益随时间的权衡。分析的 37 个物种的叶片 N/P 比平均为 20,表明森林以磷亏缺为特征。随着大气 CO(2)浓度的增加,较高的养分利用效率可能使藤本植物在生产力方面比树木受益更多,这也可能导致在养分有限的热带森林中,藤本植物的丰度增加。

相似文献

1
Contrasting cost-benefit strategy between lianas and trees in a tropical seasonal rain forest in southwestern China.中国西南热带季节性雨林中藤本植物与树木的成本效益对比策略。
Oecologia. 2010 Jul;163(3):591-9. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1579-3. Epub 2010 Feb 27.
2
Seasonal differences in leaf-level physiology give lianas a competitive advantage over trees in a tropical seasonal forest.在热带季节性森林中,叶片水平生理的季节性差异赋予藤本植物相对于树木的竞争优势。
Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(1):25-33. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1355-4. Epub 2009 May 6.
3
Root and leaf traits reflect distinct resource acquisition strategies in tropical lianas and trees.根和叶的性状反映了热带藤本植物和树木不同的资源获取策略。
Oecologia. 2016 Apr;180(4):1037-47. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3410-7. Epub 2015 Aug 9.
4
Higher water and nutrient use efficiencies in savanna than in rainforest lianas result in no difference in photosynthesis.热带草原藤本植物比热带雨林藤本植物具有更高的水分和养分利用效率,这导致它们的光合作用没有差异。
Tree Physiol. 2022 Jan 5;42(1):145-159. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpab099.
5
Different leaf cost-benefit strategies of ferns distributed in contrasting light habitats of sub-tropical forests.分布于亚热带森林不同光照生境中的蕨类植物叶片不同的成本效益策略。
Ann Bot. 2016 Mar;117(3):497-506. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv179. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
6
Lianas always outperform tree seedlings regardless of soil nutrients: results from a long-term fertilization experiment.无论土壤养分如何,藤本植物总是比树苗生长得更好:一项长期施肥实验的结果
Ecology. 2015 Jul;96(7):1866-76. doi: 10.1890/14-1660.1.
7
No evidence that elevated CO2 gives tropical lianas an advantage over tropical trees.没有证据表明升高的二氧化碳浓度会使热带藤本植物比热带树木更具优势。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 May;21(5):2055-69. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12820. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
8
Coordinated changes in photosynthesis, water relations and leaf nutritional traits of canopy trees along a precipitation gradient in lowland tropical forest.低地热带森林中冠层树木光合作用、水分关系和叶片营养性状沿降水梯度的协同变化。
Oecologia. 2004 May;139(4):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1542-2. Epub 2004 Apr 9.
9
Height-related changes in leaf photosynthetic traits in diverse Bornean tropical rain forest trees.婆罗洲不同热带雨林树木叶片光合特性与高度相关的变化
Oecologia. 2015 Jan;177(1):191-202. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3126-0. Epub 2014 Nov 2.
10
Effects of light and nutrients on seedlings of tropical Bauhinia lianas and trees.光照和养分对热带羊蹄甲藤本植物和树木幼苗的影响。
Tree Physiol. 2008 Aug;28(8):1277-85. doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.8.1277.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a liana plant functional type for vegetation models.迈向用于植被模型的藤本植物功能类型。
Ecol Modell. 2024 Dec;498:110901. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110901.
2
Behavioral and economic traits reflect distinct resource acquisition strategies in tendril vines and stem twining vines.行为和经济特征反映了卷须藤本植物和茎缠绕藤本植物不同的资源获取策略。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e70271. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70271. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Flexible Resource Allocation-Efficient Water Use Strategies Facilitate Invasion of Invasive Vine L.

本文引用的文献

1
Construction and maintenance costs of mediterranean-climate evergreen and deciduous leaves I. Growth and CO exchange analysis.地中海气候区常绿和落叶植物叶片的构建与维护成本 I. 生长及CO₂交换分析
Oecologia. 1982 Jan;53(2):208-213. doi: 10.1007/BF00545665.
2
Leaf construction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii.夏威夷本地物种和入侵物种的叶片构建成本、养分浓度及净二氧化碳同化作用
Oecologia. 1999 Nov;121(2):183-192. doi: 10.1007/s004420050920.
3
Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area.
灵活的资源分配——高效用水策略促进入侵藤本植物L.的入侵
Biology (Basel). 2024 May 29;13(6):392. doi: 10.3390/biology13060392.
4
Temperate Lianas Have More Acquisitive Strategies than Host Trees in Leaf and Stem Traits, but Not Root Traits.温带藤本植物在叶片和茎干性状上比寄主树具有更多的获取性策略,但在根系性状上并非如此。
Plants (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;11(24):3543. doi: 10.3390/plants11243543.
5
Climate and hydraulic traits interact to set thresholds for liana viability.气候和水力特性相互作用,为藤本植物的生存能力设定了阈值。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 9;13(1):3332. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30993-2.
6
Edge disturbance shapes liana diversity and abundance but not liana-tree interaction network patterns in moist semi-deciduous forests, Ghana.边缘干扰塑造了加纳湿润半落叶林中藤本植物的多样性和丰度,但未改变藤本植物与树木相互作用的网络模式。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb 20;12(2):e8585. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8585. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Differentiation in stem and leaf traits among sympatric lianas, scandent shrubs and trees in a subalpine cold temperate forest.在亚高山寒冷温带森林中,同域分布的藤本、攀援灌木和乔木在茎和叶性状上的分化。
Tree Physiol. 2021 Nov 8;41(11):1992-2003. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpab049.
8
Lianas in silico, ecological insights from a model of structural parasitism.计算机模拟中的藤本植物,结构寄生模型的生态学见解。
Ecol Modell. 2020 Sep 1;431:109159. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109159.
9
Biomass and nitrogen distribution ratios reveal a reduced root investment in temperate lianas vs. self-supporting plants.生物量和氮分配比率表明,与自支持植物相比,温带藤本植物的根系投资减少。
Ann Bot. 2019 Nov 15;124(5):777-790. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz061.
10
Dominant Species in Subtropical Forests Could Decrease Photosynthetic N Allocation to Carboxylation and Bioenergetics and Enhance Leaf Construction Costs during Forest Succession.亚热带森林中的优势物种可能会在森林演替过程中减少光合作用中氮分配到羧化作用和生物能量学的比例,并增加叶片构建成本。
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Feb 8;9:117. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00117. eCollection 2018.
比叶面积存在固有差异的物种的光合氮利用效率。
Oecologia. 1998 Aug;116(1-2):26-37. doi: 10.1007/s004420050560.
4
Photosynthetic acclimation of the liana Stigmaphyllon lindenianum to light changes in a tropical dry forest canopy.藤本植物林氏叶苞藤对热带干旱森林冠层光照变化的光合适应
Oecologia. 1999 Sep;120(4):475-484. doi: 10.1007/s004420050880.
5
Construction cost and invasive potential: comparing Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae) with co-occurring native species along pond banks.建设成本与入侵潜力:比较柳穿鱼(千屈菜科)与池塘边共同生长的本地物种。
Am J Bot. 2001 Dec;88(12):2252-8.
6
Seasonal differences in leaf-level physiology give lianas a competitive advantage over trees in a tropical seasonal forest.在热带季节性森林中,叶片水平生理的季节性差异赋予藤本植物相对于树木的竞争优势。
Oecologia. 2009 Aug;161(1):25-33. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1355-4. Epub 2009 May 6.
7
Global response patterns of terrestrial plant species to nitrogen addition.陆地植物物种对氮添加的全球响应模式。
New Phytol. 2008 Jul;179(2):428-439. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02488.x.
8
Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed.陆地生态系统中净初级生产力的氮限制在全球范围内普遍存在。
Ecology. 2008 Feb;89(2):371-9. doi: 10.1890/06-2057.1.
9
Specific leaf area relates to the differences in leaf construction cost, photosynthesis, nitrogen allocation, and use efficiencies between invasive and noninvasive alien congeners.比叶面积与入侵性和非入侵性外来同属植物在叶片构建成本、光合作用、氮分配及利用效率方面的差异有关。
Planta. 2008 Aug;228(3):383-90. doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0732-2. Epub 2008 Apr 6.
10
Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense.资源可利用性与植物抗食草动物防御
Science. 1985 Nov 22;230(4728):895-9. doi: 10.1126/science.230.4728.895.